The last paragraph in the article literally indicates there is no causal relationship or proof of any direct link between the vaccination and myocarditis. > "Finally, we cannot provide a definitive functional proof or a direct causal link between vaccination and myocarditis."
It states that they cannot provide a definitive proof or a causal link, not that there isn't one.
Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
171–180 of 662 posts
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#172"Interestingly, we recorded inflammatory foci predominantly in the right heart, which may suggest a gradual blood-stream derived dilution effect and based on this finding it is at least tempting to speculate that inadvertent intravascular vaccine injection may be contributive." Does this indicate that the authors believe aspirating the vaccine during administration would reduce the risk of myocarditis? I don't have a…
Yes. Complication from jab administration is something that has been widely discussed (not widely reported though). The clinical trials were supposed to show that the jab (and therefore the mRNA, and the resultant spike protein generated, which is known to be toxic) stayed in the muscle local to the injection site. What is widely speculated is that on some not-insubstantial portion of injections, the jab makes it int…
In practice this doesn't happen for covid vaccines, and her personal hypothesis was that many of the adverse reactions (myocarditis, or just being hit hard) were due to the vaccine partially being administered into a vein.
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do people keep thinking young people have no risk of ending up in the hospital for Covid? So many people have, and so many have died?
statistically, it is extremely unlikely[0] for an otherwise healthy young person to end up in the hospital for covid, much like myocarditis -- i am simply interested in which is more likely for specific population subsets [0] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/figures/mm6915e3-F1.g... -- from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6915e3.htm
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
You might not like that the exemption exists, but it's legal in the USA. Would you rather that religious beliefs were not respected by the government?
I would prefer the government was completely indifferent to religious beliefs. Because any belief can be construed as religious if you’re willing to take the position that religion is stupid and you don’t care about optics. So yeah, I would prefer beliefs not garner you special privileges
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’m not drawing conclusions - you invented that claim. The data I’m referring to is available in several other studies, with regards to estimated myocarditis rates in young men. But if you agree with me that it’s not unreasonable to think that is the scope of fatalities, I would urge you to integrate that new prior into things like the ethics of mandating this drug for college.
> it’s not unreasonable to think we killed tens of thousands of people with them. I mean, what is this if not a conclusion you're trying to draw?
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#176Key takeaway: >>The reported incidence of (epi-)myocarditis after vaccination is low and the risks of hospitalization and death associated with COVID-19 are stated to be greater than the recorded risk associated with COVID-19 vaccination [29].
"stated" is an interesting choice there, especially when using "recorded" a few words later. It reads as being a bit untrusting of the COVID death numbers.
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#177The last paragraph in the article literally indicates there is no causal relationship or proof of any direct link between the vaccination and myocarditis. > "Finally, we cannot provide a definitive functional proof or a direct causal link between vaccination and myocarditis."
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem here isn't the study---of course we should study possible vaccine side effects. The problem is the massive leaps of logic being made by people who have (quite wrongly, based on available evidence) become convinced that the vaccines are a greater threat to healthy people than the virus is. As unlikely as it is that an otherwise healthy young person will die from covid, it is even less likely that they'll d…
Ok, so if you believe your chance of dying of covid is improbably small due to age and overall health, why is it necessary to be vaccinated even if there's only a small chance of side effects? Rare is not zero. I don't even take OTC pain killers like advil unless I absolutely feel like I have to.
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but aren't the side-effects of covid well established, on average more severe, and much more common? You forgot to account for the risk of getting the virus. If you choose to get the vaccine, the probability is 1. But what's the probability of getting Covid? Definitely less than 1. For certain age groups (young men), the risk of complications * probability of getting the vaccine (1) was more than the risk of compli…
It's been only 3 years and basically everyone I know has had COVID, some more than once. I don't think it's significantly less than 1.
It's 60%. Probably.
Meanwhile most vaccinated people have had 2-4 shots. Also keep in mind immunity doesn't last forever, so you need to balance the risk of the shot within a certain timeframe versus the risk of Covid times the risk of complications within the same timeframe. You also can't compare the lifetime risk of Covid versus only 1 shot, both occur within a timeframe since immunity from the shot isn't forever.
Re: Autopsy-based characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
> We claimed that vaccinated people would not spread the virus. Who is "we", I have never seen anything other the claims that there were claims. Can you point me to an epidemiologist that made this claim. > And we gave the companies producing these vaccines blanket legal immunity from any potential liability. We have ALWAYS given vaccine companies blanket legal immunity. This isn't a new thing and there are good reas…
>Who is "we", I have never seen anything other the claims that there were claims. Can you point me to an epidemiologist that made this claim. https://twitter.com/guccibase/status/1488297386208378889 Included in the video: Rochelle Walensky, Monica Gandhi
These clowns are also all saying it's 100% effective which was known to be false from day 1.