Live data from Hacker News

Because it needs to be said

blogjustine.wordpress.com

521–530 of 635 posts

Re: Because it needs to be said

#521

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People in this world do just grab peoples asses, kiss them, etc. all the time without explicit consent. Even without doing body shots.

Exactly. If someone goes as far as a body shot , I consider something like kissing very minor detail. Maybe its a cultural thing. I see this in movies all the time. Now you guys are telling me its sexual assault.

Indeed, we are.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#522
post #177

A tragic event but I really don't understand how making a public blog post is supposed to make anything better.

Please read the last paragraph. She didn't want to make this post, but an outcry for details from the community forced her hand.

"forced her hand"

Oh my. This is assault. She was forced to do something she didn't want to. The exact definition of assault. Which community is this? Are you part of this community? Why are we not exposing this community. Steve, please help us expose this vile and malicious community which forces people. Today it's blogs. Tomorrow who know what it is.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#523
post #187

Reading the comments here makes me think I am in bizarro world. Is expecting women to say "No!" already too much personal responsibility for them these days? Calling this "sexual assault" is just crazy. There was no force, she never told him to stop. This would be thrown out in court without question in any half-way sane country.

Consent is not defined by the absence of a no, but a presence of a yes. The situation described falls within the definition of sexual assault in the United States, at least. I am not a lawyer. Decide for yourself: http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2907.03

By your definition, there's countless rapes in movies. Can we change the hollywood movies from here on to always ask 'may i have sex with you?' before they start making out? If they don't ask, I want these movies to be rated R since they are showing rape and possibly sexual assault.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#524
post #198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're trying to blame the victim, which is troublingly common when someone has been raped or sexually harassed but it is never the right response. It is traumatising when these things happen, it is personally demeaning and it is never acceptable. Justine is brave for coming forward and we should encourage everyone in a similar situation to do the same and support them when they do. The deeper cultural problem here i…

If the victim actually, definitely and factually is partly to be blamed, why cannot the victim be blamed? Or do you disallow facts to be said? (This comment is general and doesn't make claims about this particular case).

Because then they are no longer the victim?

Re: Because it needs to be said

#525
I see this whole blog like skydiving off a plane. You know what it involves. Mid-dive you cannot change your mind. You have to live with your decision, it's too late to go back. It's called being 'responsible', 'mature', 'growing up'. You need to understand what your decisions mean. If you keep your head, there's a good chance you will make it to the ground safely. It was surely traumatic but you are atleast living.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#526
post #287

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And why didn't she punch the aggressor? She was in shock. > Saying "no" isn't enough to claim she resisted. Why does it matter if she resisted? Is it not rape if you don't resist?

> Is it not rape if you don't resist? It's not rape if the other person has no way of telling that you want them to stop.

No, it's still rape.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#527
post #323
post #293

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This would condone drugging your victim and is obviously and dangerously wrong.

Yes, obviously that is an important exception, which doesn't change the fact that the statement is generally correct.

No, it highlights the fact that what you have said is not correct, and a court of law would show you to be wrong.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#528
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I refuse to accept that as a norm. And you already proved the exception by suggesting you can just drink soda and no-one thinks any less of you.

Often, people will think less of you. I have a 'straightedge' tattoo on my back, and even though I'd go to bars, never mention it, and just drink Coke, others felt that by not drinking I was judging them. I lost friends over it. I drink now. Possibly too much.

Seems like people like you are easily convinced to do anything. And promptly blame others when bad things happen. Best of luck.

Re: Because it needs to be said

#529

I feel bad for Joe. What he did was not malicious. He is not an abuser or predator. He did a dumb thing. This story isn't about a rapist or someone who preys on women. It's about a drunk man who thought he was going to score. A man who was becoming increasingly physical with a woman who he was attracted to, and who invited him to do a body shot after he had grabbed her ass. For those who don't know what body shots ar…

This is so fucked on so many levels. Reading the comments here, have brought up one of the major issues I've always had with the technical community -- its inability to empathize. And worse, when it comes to sexual harassment and assault, it's almost as if there's a disincentive to empathize with the victim, resulting in straight-up, outlandish comments that are on par with those of extreme, right-wing talk radio hos…

There are many of us who do empathise. While I see a lot of morons who have either outright or subtly blamed the victim, the vast majority have not and in fact for every comment that does blame a rape victim, there are two or three replies which categorically state the opinion is not acceptable.

Have heart :-)

Re: Because it needs to be said

#530

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you regularly see body shots in a non-sexual content? When could she expect it, then? What would have made the difference between this body shot and a "normal" body shot? I am not saying it was an invitation. It might not be but she cannot possibly do a body shot without expecting a fully grown alpha male to take his chances. Even if she didn't, she could have easily denied him the opportunity when things started…

You wrote: > she could have easily denied him the opportunity when things started getting too close. That's garbage. She said she froze up "like a deer in the headlights". She sounded terrified, so no - it wasn't easy at all.

Two words: Personal Responsibility. The fact she admit she froze up would in my mind maybe give the person the benefit of the doubt that he was not trying to be purposely malicious. That is the real issue here when we want to throw around terms like "sexual assault". What matters is the intent of the person when they commit these acts not that technical some sexual contact was made that was not invited when two adults in a bar that are drunk are engaging in personal contact. Nothing in this article tells us the Joe intended to assault her, only that he made a very bad decision in making a move like that before being invited to. Maybe he felt that was were it was leading from the fact that she never pulled away during 3 personal contacts that were progressive. Maybe she froze or maybe she was just too drunk to be fully aware. You have to evaluate both sides to see if the evidence points to specific motives. That is the real issue here.
Post reply on HN