Earlier quoted context omitted.
People who work in CS are known to work with scientific methods. "What if" is simply not enough. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. We, that is people who work in the field of computer science, need to demand more than guesses and beliefs when dealing with "solutions" to gender inequality. If someone has an ideas…
In order to be testable there need to be a statistically significant number of women in CS programs so I assume from your comment that you arguing for them. Or are you saying that these programs need to scientifically prove their value before existing in order to exist?
Your wording is disingenuous. It is possible to run a case study and study on a limited scale a program that would be deployed at a much larger scale.
Your statement implies the idea is tautologically false, which it is not.