111–120 of 428 posts
Can someone please do some security research on this to see what it sends when it calls home? I'm terrified to install a binary like that
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, because every time I try to use AI for any of my projects - including the "better" Anthropic and OpenAI models, I get terribly written, buggy code that has nothing to do with the domain or question. Unless I'm feeding it actual softball, single function questions it adds almost no value to my dev cycle. Mind you, all of this terrible code also costs a ton in tokens. It's sad becaus…
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, because every time I try to use AI for any of my projects - including the "better" Anthropic and OpenAI models, I get terribly written, buggy code that has nothing to do with the domain or question. Unless I'm feeding it actual softball, single function questions it adds almost no value to my dev cycle. Mind you, all of this terrible code also costs a ton in tokens. It's sad becaus…
With what I was left with at that point, it probably would have been a wash to fix that code or just start from scratch manually.
I don't blame Loveable, I think it's a wonderful product bordering on magic, like v0 and Bolt.new. I just think they are amazing products that have been over hyped to god-like status.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but I feel like we aren't allowed to be honest anymore that LLMs aren't going to replace programmers or moderate our expectations. But literally every single programmer I know has this opinion.
Agree, who is not allowing us to be honest? I have found programmers are freely talking about the limitations of AI.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but I feel like we aren't allowed to be honest anymore that LLMs aren't going to replace programmers or moderate our expectations. But literally every single programmer I know has this opinion.
Agree, who is not allowing us to be honest? I have found programmers are freely talking about the limitations of AI.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> but I feel like we aren't allowed to be honest anymore that LLMs aren't going to replace programmers or moderate our expectations. But literally every single programmer I know has this opinion.
Agree, who is not allowing us to be honest? I have found programmers are freely talking about the limitations of AI.
But the moment it gets a little less basic, its a different story. I absolutely hate the experience. So I love it and I hate it at the same time. Is it going to replace me? I don't feel like its there yet. And this has been the case for a while now.
There is just too much money and people invested in this that its hard to say anything negative about it. Nearly every VC has rebranded their websites around an AI-driven future. And, to be fair, it’s not a fad—it genuinely works well for many things. But for now, I’m still skeptical about how far it can really go.
That being said, I am using (Chinese) Deepseek r1 because there isn't currently a free LLM on par with it. I am careful with what I share though, a little more so than with any others that are not locally fun.
China is taking every venture-funded AI startup and shitting on them. Almost all of them. Tencent's Hunyuan 3D - Tripo, etc. Tencent's Hunyuan Video - Sora, Runway, Pika, etc. ByteDance's Trae - Cursor, etc. DeepSeek R1 - GPT, etc. Unitree - Figure, Tesla, Boston Dynamics, etc. And a ton of this stuff is completely open source. All of the Tencent stuff is. This destroys the moat of so many companies that have spent h…