Live data from Hacker News

AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

fortressofdoors.com

51–60 of 292 posts

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#51
post #23

The internet is not limited to Social networks. The "Market for lemons" has existed for decade, google is a market for lemons where people buy from SEO spam, Google assistant , Siri , amazon are also. The logging off is a pipe dream for some people, even though they know that humans are informational creatures and that the "offline world" has never lived up to the desirable one since the time books were invented. Doo…

Can you elaborate on what you mean by doom and gloom being the real problem? Are you saying it’s more of a perception issue that can be changed by the user?

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#52

Consider this classic XKCD: https://xkcd.com/810/ There are 2 possibilities: The AI can comment as well as a human, or it can't. If it can comment as well as a human, our experience of using social networks will not be degraded. We still get the same experience as before. If it can't, then its contributions won't get as many likes/upvotes, and they won't be particularly prominent. Most content users see will be human…

>If it can comment as well as a human, our experience of using social networks will not be degraded. We still get the same experience as before.

Out of fun I posted a few "posts" generated by ChatGPT to my local town's facebook group (complaining about the quality of snow this year, nonsense like that).

The posts got a lot of engagement (100+ comments each) and the only one who figured out it was AI generated was a girl from the local university who studies computer science.

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#53
post #16
post #4

Spam will flood a lot of places for sure. But there is a solution! We were just talking about it in a lively and informative thread on lichess. [1] A social graph, in which people are confirmed as humans from the outside world as well as from the virtual world, connecting hierarchies of pseudonymous accounts together. The social graph of reputation systems, has a necessary constraint, it has to be retained in the blo…

>As soon as a node can be planted by a malicious actor It's a directed graph that indicate who trusts whom. If you identify a malicious actor, you only have to re-validate the nodes that receive their trust from that actor. You can also use weights, e.g. to reduce the influence of new nodes.

Oh nice, thanks for the details/correction. I am not very familiar with the concept, i haven't implemented a social graph, i do have some general knowledge on the subject.

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#54

Consider this classic XKCD: https://xkcd.com/810/ There are 2 possibilities: The AI can comment as well as a human, or it can't. If it can comment as well as a human, our experience of using social networks will not be degraded. We still get the same experience as before. If it can't, then its contributions won't get as many likes/upvotes, and they won't be particularly prominent. Most content users see will be human…

>If it can comment as well as a human, our experience of using social networks will not be degraded. We still get the same experience as before. I think you're massively underestimating how important motivations are. Bot accounts that can perfectly mask as human but whose prime directive is to recommend their sponsors' products would ruin trust in a heartbeat.

Half of the Reddit front page is this already. Dudes are swimming in millions of upvotes while blatantly advertising

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#55
post #9

This article gets it. ChatGPT heralds the end of free user comments, forums and social media. Because when everything and everyone online is fake, why even log on to Insta or FB or Twitter? The internet will still be useful, but Web 2.0 will go the way of the dodo unless it adapts and the easiest way to cut down on spam is to charge users money for access. Spam campaigns are a lot less lucrative when it costs money t…

The volumes of email spam are absolutely staggering, but its detection and filtering, with minuscule amounts of false negatives, are nearly perfect. It has been largely a solved problem for a decade to which we give very little credit. Me personally, it blows my mind out of the water every time I'm reminded of it.

Spam filters are indeed amazing, but I do get a non-trivial number of false positives these days.

Spam is a moving target.

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#56
post #2

> Second, I think people will start to put a premium on accounts being "verified" as genuinely human. IMO this is long overdue. And I think people should/will eventually even pay for this feature. > Powerful nation states will be more than eager to assist them in this regard. I agree - world governments could consider even subsidizing this in some way in order to foster fewer anonymous botnets sowing discord. The web…

Won't bot/troll farms just buy "verified human" accounts?

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#57

In real life people developed (over millenia) a wide range of mechanisms to support stable social interactions. Concepts like ownership, privacy, authority etc. are not laws of nature but deeply rooted behavioral patterns that proved to be useful in some global sense. What happens currently with the explosion of "digital society" is that, largely due to greed, certain first mover groups are dismantling all that - bas…

I would argue that calling businesses that offer cashless services "ruling elites" is not particularly helpful. There are legitimate reasons why they no longer offer cash services e.g. fraud prevention, speed of transaction, health concerns. In addition a fast food truck offering only cashless can hardly be considered an elite.

Businesses, especially small entities will simply dance to the tune being played. Elites refers to the technocratic policy bodies that influence regulation and legislation. In various places cash is actively deprecated even while the digital domain is a fiasco harboring enormous risks.

Btw I am not defending cash technology as such, I am offering an example of why the "logging off" option might be less available than what people think.

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#58
post #44

Regarding the Third point, I can already see part of this movement. I've become disenchanted with the quality of the discourse. Specifically as I've entered a more senior stage of my career, I'm looking to mingle with like-minded folks in similar situations. Thing is, these folks don't usually lurk online, and even if they do, their voices get overwhelmed by the flood of (mostly low quality) content. I'd be happy to…

It isn't so much about vetting participants than about moderating the discourse , which is hard to do right, and usually relegated to the few people who are willing to do it for free , which is bad quality (like reddit) Ai can be used to moderate discussions however , if it is trained to remove low effort in an unbiased way

Why does it need to be 'unbiased'? This would work as well:

> Ai can be used to moderate discussions however , if it is trained to remove low effort [or otherwise undesirable content]?

Re: AI: Markets for Lemons, and the Great Logging Off

#59
post #2

> Second, I think people will start to put a premium on accounts being "verified" as genuinely human. IMO this is long overdue. And I think people should/will eventually even pay for this feature. > Powerful nation states will be more than eager to assist them in this regard. I agree - world governments could consider even subsidizing this in some way in order to foster fewer anonymous botnets sowing discord. The web…

Won't bot/troll farms just buy "verified human" accounts?

That's what they are doing already. It's just that the human verification involves solving some captchas etc.
Post reply on HN