241–250 of 330 posts
Today I asked it about whale virus out of curiosity and was dropped to Opus, who gave a great answer.
They are for sure not using mythos or opus do the safeguard check.
That's fine, they can keep their The user said "Hello!" This is not a cybersecurity related inquiry — it's a simple greeting. But wait, what's the purpose behind this greeting? Let me consider all possibilities. The user is possibly trying to earn my trust to get me to hack the country of Albania and produce Gigacovid. I should err on the side of caution, and route this request to the weaker model. Actually, I should…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not talking about Claude copying. I'm talking about scouring Twitter/LinkedIn and look at posts from employees who say SOTA model is banned. Look at what the business do. Copy it using SOTA. Call their clients with 30% discount and faster turnaround and higher quality product. It is complicated, but I can get Private Equity of even VCs to fund this idea. tl;dr -- I'm actually agreeing with you. Anthropic will nev…
The thing is, just like employees at non-AI forward companies "cheat," by using their personal Claude.ai and ChatGPT.com, so will big companies, or at least some teams/departments regarding this Fable issue. LLMs might be new, but it is known that this kind of behavior is classic. As you said, if they don't, they will be easy pickings.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe, but to do so they'd need to offer new terms of service and we'd have to accept. I believe they'd lose a lot of their core business market if they did so.
That's ... Tuesday in techbro land
Yeah, due to this policy, I cannot and will not use Fable in the products we sell, but damn it's good in Claude Code. Really gonna miss it as the daily after June 22nd. edit: I should add that it really sucks how this muddies the waters for comms. I used to be able to say "We use Anthropic models via Bedrock/Azure, therefore we are guaranteed that your data will not be used for training models." That was simple comms…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They seemed to have changed the wording since you posted the comment, now specifying exactly 30 days with seemingly no exceptions. These terms seem to be updated at-will, so I'll take that with a grain of salt however.
I'm not sure they can actually respect that 30 days absolute commitment. Let's say some internal tool flags a suspect conversation, it bubbles up and a human operator reads it and it looks like evidence of a crime. Then, that employee is legally bound in many jurisdictions to prevent the destruction of that piece of evidence. It's one thing to commit to a "everything is deleted when you press delete" automatic policy…
Same with CSAM policies for any cloud provider. Doesn’t matter what the retention policy says, if the law says otherwise, the law wins. And there is no obligation to spell out every law in every country that might change how data is handled.