Earlier quoted context omitted.
None of those things are knowledge. I think theres something specific around limiting access to knowledge and capabilities that makes this feel insidious.
Information is covered by ITAR, so that's not new. You can illegally export information about an ITAR covered item by just allowing a foreign national the potential to see an item. They don't even have to prove the foreign national actually did see it. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-22/chapter-I/subchapter-M...
U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
241–250 of 873 posts
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. They’re all lousy pro tariffs, anti immigration, pro tech regulations, and so on. Paul Ryan is gone.
They still spout off about free markets all the time with no sense of irony.
1: https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thomas-jefferson-street/artic...
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#243Does it mean US is allowing accessing to governments' exclusive list?
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well... there are crypto startups, and perhaps a generous definition of "money"
Crypto companies were built for anonymous transfers of wealth. It's why they are perfect for money laundering and corruption. Venture backed companies are more difficult, since you would need a paper trail (equity, incorporation documents, beneficial owners, etc.) It's not impossible, of course. It's not even terribly difficult, but it does require a different level of record. (No, I'm not saying that the goons runni…
Also most crypto companies are not good for laundering since the blockchains record that fraud forever and publicly. I could see some specific protocols where that may not be true — like monero or tornado cash — but these projects are not really startups. Most crypto startups pitch their products for enterprise customers and thus would be horrible for laundering money.
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#245Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wasn’t. Biden largely didn’t do much. The trump administration does illegal things that get struck down in courts on a daily basis. We’re all very desensitized to it. But yes, Biden was old and cognitively not well. But his “whims” didn’t exist much, and they were always fairly reasonable. Trump is the most unreasonable president, most likely in US history. I would even categorize Andrew Jackson as more restrained…
The courts struck down many Biden policies as well. People just give those a pass because "SCOTUS is rigged" or something...
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#247Next time someone tells you this is the party of free market and small government, I guess you just laugh now?
The authority under which this was done has been operative and actively used for several decades. It isn't a partisan issue, it is a policy of American governance. Anyone that has worked on frontier "dual use" technologies will be familiar with the legal regime. The only thing that changed is people are writing articles about it in the news media.
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives. Even firearms, despite a constitutional amendment! Why not models? (Note I am not arguing it's a good idea; I'm making a narrow argument that there is precedent.) EDIT: I agree that it should require an act of Congress to explicitly delegate this power.
> Regulatory agencies limit uses of other products without acts of congress-- cigarettes, vapes, drugs, pesticides, chemicals, explosives. Every one of those is by a regulatory agency that was explicitly empowered by Congress to do such regulation.
congress has abdicated its role entirely.
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Chevron doctrine gave more power to the executive agencies of the current administration, so I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make.
That repealing the chevron doctrine was a calculated play in the unitary executive theory. We all know congress is basically useless these days. But we also know that regulation isn’t, like, optional. It’s going to happen no matter what. So what’s left? Where does that decision making go? Turns out the executive, so that’s what we’ve been seeing and it’s largely uncontested. This should have been obvious to most peop…
Re: U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations
#250Don't start to rely on it . The US might remove access next month in a fit of pique. The Chinese models look increasingly more reliable and safer.
This is a pithy internet comment, but terrible advice. Between the Chinese government and Anthropic, I know which one I'd rather send tokens to. For all of the problems of the US, for-profit corporations, data harvesting, etc. the CCP (and, perhaps more troublesome, its allies) is far less likely to align with your interests.