421–430 of 746 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don't really believe in Apple being that quality team. Why?
its clear from their efforts thus far (image playground jesus fuck) that AI and even prompt engineering talent actively flocks away from them
This looks pretty promising to me. It will likely replace the need to set up OpenClaw for average personal users. The work of getting email, messages, and all the personal data on the phone as context seamlessly is not as straightforward as one might think. I'm curious how the pricing will work. Would it be free up to some limit and then some subscription pricing? I can't imagine it can be free unlimited usage given…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Destroying competition by removing the consumer choice for vertical integration in service of strong security, privacy, reliability, etc.... is mistaken. It's competing at the wrong level. The iPhone is a toaster. Nobody's up in arms about whether the toaster takes other manufacturer's crumb tray. It's a television, and nobody's demanding QLED and OLED be swappable. It's a console. Xbox doesn't play PS5 games. It's f…
Nothing about allowing others equal access to the OS means that someone can’t still choose Apple’s first party services and products. It’s not an either/or thing, it’s about preventing so called gatekeepers from anticompetitive behavior via favoring their own accessories and services while simultaneously preventing any others from possibly competing. There’s no valid reason at all a third party smartwatch shouldn’t b…
It's already user choice. The problem is too many users like the lineup. And too many who aren't going to use it, don't.
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[dead]
> why older devices can't use private cloud compute thats 100% off device is just apple being anti-consumer. I don't know if it's "anti-consumer" to NOT roll out free cloud LLM usage to everyone. The idea with only giving it to the devices with on-device AI capabilities is that ideally most of the tasks will cost Apple nothing because it will run on-device, and anything more complicated will start costing them tokens…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I struggle to believe there isn’t a significant fraction of EU citizens who are frustrated with the EU’s laws. At the very least to the extent that the whole setup limits national sovereignty. Your comment comes across as though you expect us to believe EU citizens are a homogenous whole, who happen to align with your perspective on this matter.
The alternative is more US meddling.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't get it, this looks like what I'd expect it to show me if I asked it to find a certain message. I assume tapping on that message would bring me straight to that point in the conversation.
Using AI to summarize a message by saying what the message says in the same amount of words as the message So helpful!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The reason it's showing you what's in the text is to show you a search result. The text is essentially the proof. When the user asks what plant she was telling you about, they don't have the text in front of them. It could be 200 texts back.
> It could be 200 texts back. Ok? But if I search for something just show me the thing I searched for (the proof). There is literally no need to repeat it in a slightly different tense. Who is that helping?
Microsoft cannot compete in browser race and has to adopt Chromium. Apple cannot compete in AI and has to adopt Gemini Google is a really amazing company.
In both cases, Google built a commodity that doesn't necessarily generate revenue for them. I don't think they're doing very well in this case.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would call those people uninformed. It's completely reasonable for Apple to be hesitant to roll out any new integration features within their own ecosystem in the EU. iPhone mirroring for example. Seems like practically 100% chance that if they put that out in the EU they'd be facing lawsuits for not making it work with every Android and Kindle and digital pregnancy test on the planet. And making it an open API rig…
Ignoring your silly hyperbole— Yes, it is harder to support APIs compared to… only having a completely closed system. It would take a trillion dollar company to have the kind of resources that kind of thing would take. The fact Apple thinks it should be exempt from rules that try to impose some fairness and choice, simply because “it’s hard” is the kind of thing that makes me feel they should be forced to be broken u…