Live data from Hacker News

Ferrari Luce

ferrari.com

701–710 of 959 posts

Re: Ferrari Luce

#701
post #483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, but his point stands. There is really no way to justify the price tag. With combustion engines at least you knew that you had an extremely rare feat of engineering.

I'll buy this car, mostly because I like the interior. The fact that I like the interior and I can't get it for less money is what justifies the price tag.

Just out of interest, is that a hypothetical to explain the buyers view or are you actually going to buy it?

Re: Ferrari Luce

#702
Holy smokes this looks bad, nothing like Ferrari. The car was designed by Jony Ive, but from what I can see, he has zero experience designing cars. The asking price is $640k, which is absolutely hilarious. They should've published a render on April Fool's day instead.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#703
post #404

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Model S is also a plasticky shitbox from the inside. This Ferrari will be colossally better in terms of build quality, ergonomics and handling compared to the S.

> This Ferrari will be colossally better in terms of build quality Will it? I've owned a few Ferraris and I've driven quite a few others. They're lots of fun, but I would never describe Ferrari as a company with high build quality standards.

Quality is different than something that feels “special” which every Ferrari I’ve sat in or drove has in spades.

Whether or not it’s well put together is another topic entirely.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#704
What made Ferrari think it was a good idea to have the guy who killed the headphone jack and shipped the butterfly keyboard design their first EV?

Re: Ferrari Luce

#705
Here's the English translation of your sentence:

"Certain brands, certain styles cannot switch to electric; the Green Deal doesn't apply to everything. Some machines need pistons!"

Re: Ferrari Luce

#706

I don’t understand why anyone is jumping to conclusions about anything before anyone has driven it. A Ferrari is about driving, and while it wouldn’t surprise me that the driving experience is generally the same as most EVs I’m unwilling to dismiss this based on looks alone.

> A Ferrari is about driving

Is it, though? Most Ferraris aren't driven much at all. In fact, most Ferraris are bought by collectors. If somebody has 10-20 Ferraris, do you think they drive them much? In Parallel?

Re: Ferrari Luce

#709
I'd rather a 2022 Acura NSX, but the word "Ferrari" will get a man interest from non-trivial amount of women, so there's the conspicuous consumption part of it.

Re: Ferrari Luce

#710

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO this is a risk worth taking. The Ferrari brand is rather stagnant and not innovative. They need to do something like this to drive more attention and sales. Even if this particular model does not sell well they can refine and make better selling EVs down the line.

> The Ferrari brand is rather stagnant and not innovative. They need to do something like this to drive more attention and sales. Wild assertion. Ferrari is currently #8 largest market cap for a car manufacturer. They're valued above Mercedes, BMW, Volkswagen and every other Euro car brand. They couldn't be more successful as a small automaker if they tried. But you think they need to do something like this to drive…

the world is shifting to EVs and Ferrari doesn't want to get left behind. It's making a bold statement with this model
Post reply on HN