Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

theverge.com

441–450 of 960 posts

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#441

The way I've experienced "Code Red" is mostly as a euphemism for "on-going company-wide lack of focus" and a band-aid for mid-level management having absolutely no clue how to meaningfully make progress, upper management panicking, and ultimately putting engineers and ICs on the spot to bear the brunt of that organizational mess. Interestingly enough, apart from Google, I've never seen an organization take the actual…

>I've never seen an organization take the actual proper steps (fire mid-management and PMs) to prevent the same thing from happening again.

One time, in my entire career have I seen this done, and it is as successful as you imagine it to be. Lots of weird problems coming out from having done it, but those are being treated as "Wow we are so glad we know about this problem" rather than "I hope those idiots come back to keep pulling the wool over my eyes".

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#442
post #182

"Code red" feels like theater. Competition is healthy - Google's compute advantage was always going to matter once they got serious. The real question isn't who's ahead this quarter, but whether anyone can maintain a moat when the underlying tech is rapidly commoditizing.

"Who is ahead this quarter" is pretty much all that the market and finance types care about. Maybe "who will be ahead next year" as a stretch. Nobody looks beyond a few quarters. Given how heavily AI is currently driven by (and driving!) the investment space, it's not surprising that they'll find themselves yanked around by extremely short term thinking.

People who only care about this quarter don't donate to a non-profit in the hopes it turns into an investment in a private company.

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#443

The real code red here is less that Google just one-upped OpenAI but that they demonstrated there’s no moat to be had here. Absent a major breakthrough all the major providers are just going to keep leapfrogging each other in the most expensive race to the bottom of all time. Good for tech, but a horrible business and financial picture for these companies.

Maybe there's no tangible moat still, but did Gemini 3's exceptional performance actually funnel users away from ChatGPT? The typical Hacker News reader might be aware of its good performance on benchmarks, but did this convert a significant number of ChatGPT users to Gemini? It's not obvious to me either way.

Anecdotally yes. Since launch I’ve observed probably 50% of the folks that were “ChatGPT those that” all the time suddenly talking about Gemini non-stop. The more that gets rolled into Google’s platform the more there’s point to using separate tooling from OpenAI. There’s a reason Sam is calling this “code red.”

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#444
(My apologies if this was already asked - this thread is huge and Find-In-Page-ing for variations of "pre-train", "pretrain", and "train" turned up nothing about this. If this was already asked I'd super-appreciate a pointer to the discussion :) )

Genuine question: How is it possible for OpenAI to NOT successfully pre-train a model?

I understand it's very difficult, but they've already successfully done this and they have a ton of incredibly skilled and knowledgeable, well-paid and highly knowledgeable employees.

I get that there's some randomness involved but it seems like they should be able to (at a minimum) just re-run the pre-training from 2024, yes?

Maybe the process is more ad-hoc (and less reproducible?) than I'm assuming? Is the newer data causing problems for the process that worked in 2024?

Any thoughts or ideas are appreciated, and apologies again if this was asked already!

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

chatgpt making targeted "recommendations" (read ads) is a nightmare. especially if it's subtle and not disclosed.

The end game is its a sales person and not only is it suggesting things to you undisclosed. It's using all of the emotional mechanisms that a sales person uses to get you to act.

My go-to example is The Truman Show [0], where the victi--er, customer is under an invisible and omnipresent influence towards a certain set of beliefs and spending habits.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzKSQrhX7BM

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#446

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a novice programmer -- I have programmed for 35+ years now but I build and lose the skills moving between coder to manager to sales -- multiple times. Fresh IC since last week again :) I have coded starting with Fortran, RPG and COBOL and I have also coded Java and Scala. I know modern architecture but haven't done enough grunt work to make it work or to debug (and fix) a complex problem. Needless to say sometim…

I have never considered trying to apply Claude/Gemini/etc. to Fortran or COBOL. That would be interesting.

I was just giving my history :) but yes I am sure this could actually get us out of the COBOL lock-in which requires 70 years old programmers to continue working.

The last article I could find on this is from 2020 though: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/06/new-jersey-seeks-cobol-progr...

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#447

OpenAI is basically just Netscape at this point. An innovative product with no means of significant revenue generation. One one side it's up against large competitors with an already established user base and product line that can simply bundle their AI offerings into those products. Google will do just what Microsoft did with Internet Explorer and bundle Gemini in for 'Free' with their already other profitable produ…

> Google will do just what Microsoft did with Internet Explorer and bundle Gemini in for 'Free' with their already other profitable products and established ad-funded revenue streams.

Just some numbers to show what OpenAI is against:

    GMail users: nearing 2 billion
    Youtube MAU: 2.5 billion
    active Android devices: 4 billion (!)
    Market cap: 3.8 trillion (at a P/E of 31)
So on one side you've got this behemoth with, compared to OpenAI's size, unlimited funding. The $25 bn per year OpenAI is after is basically a parking ticket for Google (only slightly exaggerating). Behemoth who came with Gemini 3 Pro "thinking" and Nano Banana (that name though) who are SOTA.

And on the other side you've got the open-source weights you mentioned.

When OpenAI had its big moment HN was full of comments about how it was game over for Google for search was done for. Three years later and the best (arguably the best) model gives the best answer when you search... Using Google search.

Funny how these things turns out.

Google is atm the 3rd biggest cap in the world: only Apple and NVidia are slightly ahead. If Google is serious about its AI chips (and it looks like they are) and see the fuck-ups over fuck-ups by Apple, I wouldn't be surprised at all if Alphabet was to regain the number one spot.

That's the company OpenAI is fighting: a company that's already been the biggest cap in the entire world and that's probably going to regain that spot rather sooner than later and that happens to have crushed every single AI benchmark when Gemini 3 Pro came out.

I had a ChatGPT subscription. Now I'm using Gemini 3 Pro.

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#448

IMHO Gemini surpassed ChatGPT by quite a bit - I switched. Gemini is faster, the thinking mode gives me reliably better answers and it has a more "business like" conversation attitude which is refreshing in comparison to the over-the-top informal ChatGPT default.

Ironically, the thing that annoys me most about Gemini is the Discord-esque loading messages in the CLI. Twee is one thing: mixing twee with serious hints is worse.

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#449

I've seen a rumor going around that OpenAI hasn't had a successful pre-training run since mid 2024. This seemed insane to me but if you give ChatGPT 5.1 a query about current events and instruct it not to use the internet it will tell you its knowledge cutoff is June 2024. Not sure if maybe that's just the smaller model or what. But I don't think it's a good sign to get that from any frontier model today, that's 18 m…

What is a pre-training run?

Pre-training is just training, it got the name because most models have a post-training stage so to differentiate people call it pre-training.

Pre-training: You train on a vast amount of data, as varied and high quality as possible, this will determine the distribution the model can operate with, so LLMs are usually trained on a curated dataset of the whole internet, the output of the pre-training is usually called the base model.

Post-training: You narrow down the task by training on the specific model needs you want. You can do this through several ways:

- Supervised Finetuning (SFT): Training on a strict high quality dataset of the task you want. For example if you wanted a summarization model, you'd finetune the model on high quality text->summary pairs and the model would be able to summarize much better than the base model.

- Reinforcement Learning (RL): You train a separate model that ranks outputs, then use it to rate the output of the model, then use that data to train the model.

- Direct Preference Optimizaton (DPO): You have pairs of good/bad generations and use them to align the model towards/away the kinds of responses you want.

Post-training is what makes the models able to be easily used, the most common is instruction tuning that teaches to model to talk in turns, but post-training can be used for anything. E.g. if you want a translation model that always translates a certain way, or a model that knows how to use tools, etc. you'd achieve all that through post-training. Post-training is where most of the secret sauce in current models is nowadays.

Re: OpenAI declares 'code red' as Google catches up in AI race

#450
post #393

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NME at all - 5.1 codex has been the best by far.

How can you stand the excruciating slowness? Claude Code is running circles around codex. The most mundane tasks make it think for a minute before doing anything.

I use it on medium reasoning and it's decently quick. I only switch to gpt-5.1-codex-max xhigh for the most annoying problems.
Post reply on HN