The linked article from Le Parisien (a big French billionaire-owned newspaper) is quite nuanced. It gives the police's view on narco-trafic crime, but also Graphene's take : "Criminals and traffickers also use knives." This organization, which is not a company but a foundation, emphasizes that its solution is used by ordinary people who dislike how apps and operating systems handle their data. It adds that if crimina…
One thing though is - knives, fast cars and cash aren't built with deliberate motivation of thwarting the law enforcement and criminal investigations. GrapheneOS and its systems are - you can walk through history and see that they're deliberately working on systems that defeat law enforcements efforts of collecting data from seized devices and tracking criminal networks. This is a massive difference - even for knives…
France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
111–120 of 399 posts
Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#112I think your devices should have government-mandated backdoors if and only if you are a public servant. I don't understand why private citizens are held to higher standards of conduct than politicians and cops.
Even if you're a public servant, a backdoor is a big security risk.
Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#113Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#114If the small guys are getting threats like this, one can only assume the big guys already have suitable backdoors...
Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#115Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#116The linked article from Le Parisien (a big French billionaire-owned newspaper) is quite nuanced. It gives the police's view on narco-trafic crime, but also Graphene's take : "Criminals and traffickers also use knives." This organization, which is not a company but a foundation, emphasizes that its solution is used by ordinary people who dislike how apps and operating systems handle their data. It adds that if crimina…
One thing though is - knives, fast cars and cash aren't built with deliberate motivation of thwarting the law enforcement and criminal investigations. GrapheneOS and its systems are - you can walk through history and see that they're deliberately working on systems that defeat law enforcements efforts of collecting data from seized devices and tracking criminal networks. This is a massive difference - even for knives…
Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#117I think your devices should have government-mandated backdoors if and only if you are a public servant. I don't understand why private citizens are held to higher standards of conduct than politicians and cops.
Backdoors exist for everyone or they exist for no one, this technology isn't one that has room for a gray area to debate. If it can be deployed to public servant devices, it can be deployed to your device.
Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#118I think EncroChat scared them pas-de-merde, and this may be an overreaction by untutored civil servants.
In the end, wasn't EncroChat a larger problem for the criminals than the governments? Once it became a big enough target it got taken down, and then quietly run by the police who collected everybody's messages for months before triggering a huge round of arrests, including quite a bit of major organized crime across Europe. The dangers of centralization. They'd love another EncroChat! Doesn't apply so much to Graphen…
Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#119Re: France threatens GrapheneOS with arrests / server seizure for refusing backdoors
#120I think your devices should have government-mandated backdoors if and only if you are a public servant. I don't understand why private citizens are held to higher standards of conduct than politicians and cops.
Note that having their personal device when doing government work should be prohibited (that is you can't have it in your pocket when working). As is using your personal device for anything government (other than a formula check your government device call/text - employees should be regularly tested that they report any government communication that doesn't follow the formula)