Live data from Hacker News

My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

sashachapin.substack.com

391–400 of 444 posts

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reductionist biological explanation might be obvious to you, but in the actual world, the reasoning and the moral condemnation of things like plastic surgery is never explicitly about giving false signals regarding one's reproductive fitness. Reasons "haters" cite are about vanity, narcissism, refusing to look your age, etc.

For me, motivation matters. If you want to learn social skills to make your life easier while not harming others, that's perfectly fine, admirable even, but if you learn it to damage others for your own profit, that's immoral. Same for the motivation of surgeries. You might not be comfortable with yourself, and want to change something, and that's perfectly fine, but again to changing appearance signal something to b…

[dead]

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#393
If you're a tech worker who would like to improve your social skills or overcome mild to moderate social anxiety, I can whole-heartedly recommend working as a server nights and weekends for a few months. As a server, you will always have a clear purpose guiding each interaction, eliminating the sometimes intimidating open-endedness of more casual settings. But you'll be constantly talking to people, and you'll meet all kinds. You'll also have many opportunities to have structured and unstructured interactions with coworkers. It's a fantastic way to get in lots of reps in a short time.

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#395
post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's very strange that people are ok with people charming others "naturally" (while it's probably because they learned by imitation, often from parents) while "practicing it" is seen as bad and manipulative. It's the same with genetics. Getting lucky with looks is fine but working for the same goal (eg surgery) is somehow bad and people often hide it.

You say ‘somehow’ like the reasoning isn’t obvious. Physical attractiveness is a signal of reproductive fitness when it’s genetic, and not otherwise.

> Physical attractiveness is a signal of reproductive fitness when it’s genetic, and not otherwise.

Nay, artificial physical attractiveness is also a signal of reproductive fitness. It isn't a given. It's the subject's genes that made a brain that was able to design (and to arrange to pay for!) the improved attractiveness.

It's not qualitatively different from brushing hair.

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#396
post #394

Ugh ... people are the worst! Why would you want to connect with them???

Because people are also different and , surprise, want different things in life. Not everyone is happy being alone (not lonely) like me, and presumably you too.

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#397

This post wasn't what I was expecting from the "socially normal" title. While there is a lot of self-reflection and growth in this piece, a lot of the points felt more like learning how to charm, manipulate, and game social interactions. Look at the first two subheadings: > 1: Connecting with people is about being a dazzling person > 2: Connecting with people is about playing their game The post felt like a rollercoa…

> to charm, manipulate, and game

There is surely nothing wrong with being charming.

The "manipulate, and game", just per dictionary, would mean in this context something close to "control or influence unscrupulously". What social norms exactly do you see broken/bent by the OP? Because I see none.

Are you trying to influence this comment section unscrupulously?

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#399

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> A lot of stuff "normal" people do is charm, manipulate, and game social interactions. Except because they are not conscious about it, we give them a pass. I don’t think that’s a fair comparison to what’s describe in this blog post. The writer describes taking on different personas and trying different tricks with other people portrayed as subjects of some sort of experiment. The casual mentions of how they tried so…

> The writer describes taking on different personas and trying different tricks with other people portrayed as subjects of some sort of experiment. It’s typically not done quite so intentionally, but this sounds like most folks’ junior high and high school years. Sometimes also college. I know I totally changed in those years, and it was mostly by noticing what “worked” and leaning into it.

It is also how a lot of people behave professionally and in their dating life, even later in life.

Re: My stages of learning to be a socially normal person

#400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being authentic, is about understanding oneself, and being able to communicate oneself better to others so they can understand you better too. When we win, by being a better collaborator with others, it isn't operating in a shallow or selfish sense. It isn't treating others like instruments for our benefit over theirs. It isn't manipulation.

We are mincing words. I don’t think collaboration, altruism, and other pro social traits are exclusive of instrumentalizing. Whatever word you want to use that encompasses pro social behaviors, let’s use that word if you don’t like instrumentalizing.

> We are mincing words.

Good point.

These words are unfortunately loaded. "instrumentalizing" is so close to "instrument" for me to see them as unrelated in meaning. But lots of similar words drift in meaning, or have several interpretations.

I don't have any issue with people doing things for "natural" reasons, vs. realpolitik analytical reasons, when the motive is still benefit-neutral, or benefit-benefit relative to ourselves-others.

Post reply on HN