Live data from Hacker News

Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

nytimes.com

451–460 of 1001 posts

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#451
post #89

Can someone ELI5 the power networks involved here? I didn't expect to see Harvard getting smacked around or humiliated like this. Between Harvard, Yale, and possibly a few other schools, I thought they had influence throughout government. And that key figures in government were interested in maintaining and benefiting from that influence. And a lot of that influence seemed aligned with national interests. (For exampl…

[flagged]

The administration’s letter to Harvard (which they later claimed to have sent in error) made it clear that their intent is to root out what they perceive as liberal ideological bias at Harvard - nothing really to do with Israel, that was just an excuse. Whether there is a liberal bias is something I will leave others to debate (and if there is, whether that provides grounds for federal action, given the freedoms afforded by the first amendmemt), but I think the Administration’s actions had more to do with throwing red meat to the base than it did with an factual inquiry

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#452

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably this: https://www.trumpstore.com/product/trump-2028-hat/

Huh, that page actually seems to admit that the third term is not valid: > Rewrite the rules with the Trump 2028 high crown hat. Or perhaps I misunderstand what they mean with "rewrite the rules".

They know it's not valid. That's why they want to rewrite the rules.

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#453
post #89

Can someone ELI5 the power networks involved here? I didn't expect to see Harvard getting smacked around or humiliated like this. Between Harvard, Yale, and possibly a few other schools, I thought they had influence throughout government. And that key figures in government were interested in maintaining and benefiting from that influence. And a lot of that influence seemed aligned with national interests. (For exampl…

You're overthinking this. The university is vocal about keeping its independence. That's enough to warrant retaliation from this president.

It's also the pinnacle university, at least in optics.

It is like getting Zuck to kneel and donate $1M. Once he did that, everyone else donated a $1M and peaced out.

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#454
post #391

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

An election only puts a few people in an office. If those people try to exert their will through force (which, I wouldn’t classify cutting Harvard off as using force, just being a jerk) and there can be severe physical consequences done to the state for that action, then I wouldn’t call it a dictatorship at that point.

There are no consequences. The president has immunity and the courts are about to have the option of criminal contempt prosecutions removed. Cletus and his stockpile of ammunition are going to have little or no impact and he will be hunted down by law enforcement who are very much toeing the line.

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#456

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend is a big Harvard alum. He says that most of his classmates are very unhappy with the direction of the university. So in his circle the alumni may be cheering this on. Maybe not the extremism but the general idea of telling Harvard that it needs to get back to truth-seeking.

It boggles my mind that anyone with, apparently and allegedly, such a high tier education, would be against the actions Harvard has been taking this year. They are literally just fighting for basic academic freedoms.

[flagged]

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#457

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A friend is a big Harvard alum. He says that most of his classmates are very unhappy with the direction of the university. So in his circle the alumni may be cheering this on. Maybe not the extremism but the general idea of telling Harvard that it needs to get back to truth-seeking.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#458
post #367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can multiple things not be true at the same time? Or is it one of those "our" billionaires type of thing?

Multiple things can be true at the same time. But they aren't, in this case. Trump and his ilk are attacking academia because they think that universities are all woke. There's no other reasoning required. Leaders within his community have said this in public very clearly. The goal is to destroy academia.

And attacking Harvard, specifically, because they won't bend the knee. There's not really anything more to it than that. Trump is a petty, small man who cares only about enriching himself and punishing his perceived enemies.

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#459
post #89

Can someone ELI5 the power networks involved here? I didn't expect to see Harvard getting smacked around or humiliated like this. Between Harvard, Yale, and possibly a few other schools, I thought they had influence throughout government. And that key figures in government were interested in maintaining and benefiting from that influence. And a lot of that influence seemed aligned with national interests. (For exampl…

It’s less a shift in power networks and more about Trump using existing presidency tools more aggressively. Harvard didn’t lose influence, it’s being targeted because it's outspoken and symbolic. The immigration authority falls under the executive branch, so the president can act unilaterally, without needing broader support.

Re: Trump administration halts Harvard's ability to enroll international students

#460

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your hatred is clouding your judgement. It is very clear that the issue of the protests is being used by an American government to pursue a much broader agenda. Israel and antisemitism are merely the most convenient instrument. But since you are trapped in (charitably) a prejudicial mind bubble you can only see this as further proof of a tiny group of people somehow controlling everything...

Protesting the actions of the Israeli government is not anti-semitic.

I didn't say he was antisemitic.
Post reply on HN