71–80 of 165 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We plan to add more models over time.
My complaint isn't about more models in fact, it's about not depending on OpenAI (and not feeding them with data and money), so I would rather have less models (just llama3) rather than more
Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, your IP is not "you". It's most definitely not your PII, per se. It is PII when used in conjunction with other data(even under fairly strict GPDR rules). The party storing the IP must have means of associating that IP with you, not simply "a city". I mean... I can write an anonymous letter, drop it into the mailbox of my local post office and there will be a stamp of where and when that letter was mailed from. Is…
EU law says your IP is PII. When you have the /24 of a searcher, and assets on X% of websites where that same IP accesses clicking through from a search, I mean, it's well known that this is not very private. And also doing xx searches a day. The idea of anonymity becomes a fantasy.
I didn't know Claude until I saw it as an option for DDG chat model. What caught my attention was the tagline "instant". Interesting. I decided to give it a try with expectations to see answers coming up almost instantly. And they really did. I'm enjoying it so far.
For what it's worth, Claude instant is part of Anthropic's first generation of models. There have been two more since then. Today (3rd gen) they have haiku, sonnet, opus. Worth checking out. Opus is competitive (many say better) than GPT-4
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Give me another one then? It’s a search engine with no search index. It’s an ads supported site without an ads network. What is it then if not a wrapper?
> DuckDuckGo is an American software company that __offers a number of products__ intended to help people protect their online privacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DuckDuckGo
The discussion here is what you would get if bought DDG, and the answer is…very little.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What would make their machines more trustworthy than OpenAI's or Anthropic's?
Them saying they will not use our data or allow 3rd parties to use our data. This effort is weak sauce.
Either use one of the many open models that beat GPT-3.5 and you have a real, and better!, product.
I literally have no idea what the point of this is, or why not make the actual step of rolling out a real private LLM. It’s literally inferior to what Mixtral provides right now, under Apache license.
Test query: Buy bulk pvc in cheyenne, wy FastGPT from kagi recommends national chains, a local plumbing supply store or two, and a specific facebook market page. All of these have hyperlinks. DDG just gives generic advice about national chains. I think the difference is that Kagi built a RAG model out of a web crawl.
What does "bulk pvc" even mean. Pipe? Fittings? Tubing? Sheets? Fabric?
Anyway, it's an intentionally hard query. I tried "tourism in mountain view, ca" first. They both do fine (though DDG doesn't provide links), since there's enough on the internet about that for the base GPT-3.5 model to recall it without additional context.
Who, exactly, wanted to ask a search engine questions that would be answered by bullshit? I quote: what is the stoichiometric ratio between 2NO2 and N2O4 The stoichiometric ratio between nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) is 1:1. This means that for every one molecule of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) that reacts, one molecule of dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) is formed. The equilibrium reaction between nitr…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
EU law says your IP is PII. When you have the /24 of a searcher, and assets on X% of websites where that same IP accesses clicking through from a search, I mean, it's well known that this is not very private. And also doing xx searches a day. The idea of anonymity becomes a fantasy.
We don't pass any parts of the IP to anyone.
And again, hitting Microsoft IPs. Microsoft have assets on many websites, so the correlation is trivial over time, no specific IP needed, no cookies needed.