Live data from Hacker News

Vice website is shutting down

writing.exchange

461–470 of 477 posts

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#461
Was Vice a thing? I only occasionally visited the site, mostly after having link to a presumably interesting story.

Most of the content I found mildly interesting at best, but my major criticism is everything is stretched in overly long narratives. TLDR in almost all cases I visited the site.

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"openly fascist" I disagree with you here. Proud boys was originally created out of the need to protect people from the likes of Antifa, which is a facist group. Most activists/hacktivists are fascists. If you don't agree with them, they cause issue, violence, and/or destruction until they get their way. Opposing groups like this does not make one fascist. Lots of what Gavin does is satire...which many people apparen…

| Proud boys was originally created out of the need to protect people from the likes of Antifa, which is a facist group. Even Gavin McInness says you're wrong here. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-secret-history-o... | McInnes, an avid boozer, has consistently maintained that he started the Proud Boys as an outlet for harmless fun: an Animal House-style drinking club for male buddies. https://web.archive.…

> Even Gavin McInness says you're wrong here.

Could you link to the quote where he says this? The article claims he said it, but I couldn’t find the quote.

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#465

They ran out of dangerous places to do designer drugs. In all honesty, Vice was a cool outlet for out-there stories for teens and adults alike. Shame it’s shutting down but then again I never supported it.

Back in the aughts I thought Vice felt legitimately edgy, surprising, adventurous. Then, they realized they could get boatloads of money from 'traditional' media companies, that desperately wanted to look not-traditional and thats when the character changed IMO. Then numerous sexual misconduct cases, key leaders replaced, and it was dead.

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#467
post #312

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you don’t have some form of automated throttling, couldn’t that still become costly if a popular webpage started pulling resources from that bucket? If so, their warning could have been phrased better, but isn’t incorrect.

You can put the bucket behind Cloudfront and only give access to the bucket to Cloudfront.

But then, would the OP get an email saying they have “one or more S3 buckets that allow read or write access from any user on the Internet”?

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#468

This sure feels like another notch in the "the web is fundamentally broken" belt. Google search continues to get worse, I can't find a recipe without diving past a few dozen ads, and now content creation sites are abandoning their own domains in favor of posting their new content direct to social media. It really is starting to feel like the web will be nearly useless in the next year or two.

Sure it is and this trend is depressing.

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#469

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, he left Vice over "creative differences" a couple of years before he founded Proud Boys. He wasn't as openly fascist while at Vice, though Vice definitely had to do some damage control over his comments.

"openly fascist" I disagree with you here. Proud boys was originally created out of the need to protect people from the likes of Antifa, which is a facist group. Most activists/hacktivists are fascists. If you don't agree with them, they cause issue, violence, and/or destruction until they get their way. Opposing groups like this does not make one fascist. Lots of what Gavin does is satire...which many people apparen…

I don't think it was started specifically for that, it was just a boozer group I think. But then Antifa started bashing grandma's and someone had to step up.

Re: Vice website is shutting down

#470
The Internet Archive taking over a dead website domains and URL's makes sense to keep them useful to web users (the ongoing fee of the domain name is a pain, but not that expensive)

we have taken over other people's systems with mechanism (like purl.org ) but a static website would be even easier--

redirects galore (20 million broken links fixed in wikipedia) or give us the domain name. We even had a 404 handler people could put on their website, but that may be out of date-- if others want to put it on their website (please vice!) we would bring it up to date.

We also have a 404 service in the Brave browswer (go Brave!). Please communicate to Chrome folks, Mozilla, others how awesome it would be for them to build this into their browser.

info@archive.org if you would like to do something like this.

-brewster Digital Librarian, Internet Archive

Post reply on HN