Live data from Hacker News

No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

who.int

361–370 of 385 posts

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#361

So much denialism going on here, it's like talking to my alcoholic relative. This shouldn't trigger such a strong reaction, if it does, one should look into why that is.

being told what you should be doing by the self-righteous will tend to produce this effect

All the article proposes are warnings on labels like they exist for tobacco. No telling you what to do at all.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#362
post #351

So much denialism going on here, it's like talking to my alcoholic relative. This shouldn't trigger such a strong reaction, if it does, one should look into why that is.

> So much denialism going on here, it's like talking to my alcoholic relative. This shouldn't trigger such a strong reaction, if it does, one should look into why that is. Ever read any HN thread where the article states that to combat obesity one just have to eat less? ... yeah.

Not the same at all, I don't know what you're getting at.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#363
post #38

I wonder how the data is treated statistically. If 99% of millionaires have consumed alcohol, does consuming alcohol increase the chance of becoming a millionaire!?

Do you think researchers are idiots?

A significant proportion of them are, unless you assume that proportion is just blatantly dishonest.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication_crisis

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#364
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I dunno, is it a solid article? They say "Risks start from the first drop" and I am having a a hard time imagining how they could prove that, regardless of how likely it is. Looks like fearmongering. I'm sympathetic to the idea that everyone should stop drinking. I'm not a fan of mind-altering drugs and it makes for boring conversation. But we need to get used to the idea that literally nothing is safe. Living kills…

"Risks start from the first drop" If this is true, the medical community is actively causing harm. Many compounded or suspended children's medicines contain alcohol. Many do not have alcohol free alternatives.

Acetaminophen is cytotoxic and causes liver damage. No amount of it is safe. Yet we have children's tylenol.

Why? Because the body heals whatever miniscule damage occurs with small amounts. The trade off is one which we decide to leave to people to make with their judgment.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#365

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Risks start from the first drop" If this is true, the medical community is actively causing harm. Many compounded or suspended children's medicines contain alcohol. Many do not have alcohol free alternatives.

Acetaminophen is cytotoxic and causes liver damage. No amount of it is safe. Yet we have children's tylenol. Why? Because the body heals whatever miniscule damage occurs with small amounts. The trade off is one which we decide to leave to people to make with their judgment.

Then why do they fear monger with alcohol and not Tylenol? That's my question.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#366

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So when you walk outside and into the sun, you're exposed to radiation, we need sunlight exposure to live, so again bringing up the parents comments regarding the need for "practical" advice.

By radiation here it is meant ionizing radiation, which comes in 3 major forms (exceptions do exist): 1- Alpha radiation: Basically helium atoms. Pretty harmless on the outside of your body, really really bad if inside your body. Do not eat/inhale. 2- Beta radiation: Electrons. Harmfulness varies, kinda. Stay away from it. 3- Gamma radiation: Likely what you're thinking of. These are photons. Harmfulness increases wi…

My understanding is you actually need to wear sunscreen that blocks UVb and a lot doesn't. Which is why Zinc is preferred in places like Australia, because it actually "blocks" UVa/UVb, does'nt just stop you from getting red skin, it protects your DNA from radiation.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#367

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, he is known for this graph (The Lancet, 2010): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt#/media/File:HarmCau...

I would think Crack Cocaine, Heroin, and Methamphetamine are similar to in harm to others (and there’s no way methamphetamine is that much less harmful to others, unless he’s not aware that smoke and production of it are toxic). I’m guessing most of that comes from it being illegal and people needing to steal to get it, so even more surprising is how harmful alcohol is to others even though it is legal. Full paper: h…

For judging harm it's interesting how the culture and economics around a drug may chiefly determine the harm, not the substance itself. The measurable harm of different drugs varies across regions.

As far as I know.... unlike the US, the UK doesn't have a large community of dependent meth users. The level of distribution is low and if some did become available, it would probably be used by poly-drug users as an alternative/combination to other party drugs and not give much of an on-ramp to habitual use. The measurable harm would be acute health events like heart issues etc. and not the consequences of long-term use.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#368

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, he is known for this graph (The Lancet, 2010): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt#/media/File:HarmCau...

Yikes! Alcohol looks like almost 75... harm units? I assume 100 is punching a kitten? I assume he was sacked for producing such a poor data visualization, or just the political "data" behind it?

No. He was sacked by an anti-science government pandering to a voter block scared and hostile to liberalisation of drug laws.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#369

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hold on, there is a lot of popular wisdom that thinks that small amounts of alcohol is either harmless or beneficial. Solid research on that topic absolutely is valuable. Everyone absolutely does not know that small amounts are harmful.

Exactly, I love that this is publicized and hopefully minds will change over the next years and decades like they did with cigarettes.

> like they did with cigarettes.

THEY ABSOLUTELY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!

Animals enjoy alcohol too, it's a beverage, it's a natural substance, there's no way that alcohol it's gonna be like cigarettes!

Hotdogs are bad for your health, do you think hotdogs and cigarettes are the same thing?

Do you really believe that alcohol is a modern addiction, like tobacco industry?

Have you ever heard that Christians drink wine because it's the blood of Jesus Christ? (who turned the water into wine BTW!)

Do you know that radical Islam prohibits alcohol because it can induce a loss of self-control?

Do you believe that radical Islam is the way to go for the future?

I really don't.

Alcohol is rooted in our ancestry, it's part of who we are, stop blaming substances, this is truly a modern take: it's the never ending bullshit of the war on drugs that started with prohibionism, it's the USA that promote the puritan way of life, while destroying the planet more than everybody else combined and indulging in the worst possible lifestyle (eating garbage, drinking like there's no tomorrow, working to death, healthcare considered a luxury etc.), it's the same old story of Americans not understanding that their problems are absolutely not everyone's problems

The oldest verifiable brewery has been found in a prehistoric burial site in a cave near Haifa in modern-day Israel. Researchers have found residue of 13,000-year-old beer that they think might have been used for ritual feasts to honor the dead

Those who believe alcohol is a fad are simply delusional.

Re: No level of alcohol consumption is safe for our health

#370

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s happening to a lot of younger adults in their 30s now too.

You don't actually know if alcohol is the cause, it might be all the other shit that we've put into the environment to, such as PFOAs, PFOS, Microplastics, air polltion and more and more...

> You don't actually know if alcohol is the cause

On an individual basis, no. But on a macro, yes. We can pretty directly attribute a large % of liver-related deaths directly to alcohol.

Post reply on HN