Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is the (#2/#3/#4 depending on study) leading cause of death. We're currently at around ~150K dead/year - about 5 times the average rate of flu, about 3 times a really bad flu year. It has significantly affected workforce participation, with a large disability burden. You'd notice. Unless you're somewhat dense.
Not that I like it but, I happen to think it's just a new normal as well and if everyone starts behaving as if it's normal then the impact on global economics when compared to a similar period should be rather normal. Continuing lockdowns and other things that impact supply chains/production are examples of behaving like it's not normal. They will likely continue to some degree despite my opinions.
As for "continuing lockdowns" - most of the western world hasn't had a single actual lockdown. So let's not pretend that's the issue, or a desired approach to the problem.
What is needed is
- data transparency, instead of reduced data collection.
- targeted measures, instead of blanket measures. Utilizing the above data, and focusing on leading indicators, not trailing ones.
- a medical system that actually makes the tools we have available, as opposed to undermining them and pricing them out of range.
- a focus on ventilation.
- a normalization of mask wearing in public indoor settings.
None of those are close to "lockdowns". That's a strawman nobody is asking for.