Earlier quoted context omitted.
> companies can speak with the police and follow their wishes regardless of the first amendment because Twitter's own protected speech allows them to block any content for any reason, whether that be "it violated our content on harassment" or "the police don't like it and we're voluntarily following their wishes". Even if that wasn't against the First Amendment (which is a more complicated issue [1]), that wouldn't f…
Companies generally already do this with non-FISA "National Security Letter Requests" - Apple received between 1 and 499 between January and June 2021[0], and Google received between 500 – 999 in the same time frame[1]. Of course, this is nothing like allowing arbitrary content censorship in collaboration with law enforcement, which would indeed trigger a lot more outrage and bad PR. 0: https://www.apple.com/legal/tr…
[1]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter