Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it? I'm one of those free speech people, I think, but I do recognize that some 'speech' is harassment when combined with action. Not because of the content, but because you're intending to disrupt somebody, such as following them around all day and yelling. DDoS seems like that. Doesn't it? I mean you're not even saying anything. It's like saying throwing rocks at a window is speech. "What? I'm just trying to say…
As an absolutist, this line of thinking just doesn't have a stopping point. Speech acts are inherently violent. There is no line to draw.
People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
101–110 of 121 posts
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes they did: https://kiwifarms.net/search/15388568/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.... I guess that's part of the reason why there are very specific accounts in this thread promoting obvious misinformation without citing any sources.
To be honest, having read through this entire thread, you are the only user that sticks out as having some below-the-surface agenda and hiding behind a new account. People in glass houses really shouldn't throw stones.
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#103Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> to whom everyone right of Mao is fascist. This doesn't sound like an accurate description of a guy who openly critizes Stalin and whines all day about "tankies".
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was all set to write a comment about how I'm not OK with private companies deciding who can exist on the internet - but then I remembered that all CloudFlare does is caching and DDOS protection. Without CloudFlare the website would still be accessible on the Internet. And to me that makes a big difference.
The implication is that Keffals and friends will DDoS the site out of existence, as they have apparently tried to do numerous times. This is of course criminal but goes unmentioned.
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Those are pretty poor examples of anything. nymag doesn't even get basic facts correctly. If posting bias uninformed hit pieces is all it took to win debates then the world would be a pretty sad place.
The nymag article has many links to archive.org historical versions of the site. People can judge for themselves by looking at the original facts instead of meta-commentary which attempts to summarize over facts. People can also visit Wikipedia for more links. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is that, much like the alleged body count, they do nothing of the sort. See my post above. They don't harass or even troll. It's literally one of the core rules of the site. Look (and laugh) but don't touch! If you ever try to organize something on-site, you'll get down-voted, your post deleted and potentially even banned. Attempting to swat isn't just not allowed on the site, but most members call out ac…
I mean we can look at what happened to Chloe Sagal to see what "look (and laugh) but don't touch" does to people.
It seems very much like you've been reading fud from opportunistic people.. and from the sound of it some of the same people who threw Chloe under the bus the day it happened.
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#108Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
Nothing official? It's a literal confirmation of their death by their employer. You're literally all over this thread spreading easily verifiable misinformation, it's frankly just sad. If you had any integrity you'd update your comments to reflect that you were wrong, but of course you won't because you are deliberately lying about the site.
Re: People are demanding that Cloudflare drop Kiwi Farms
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that the guy who faked his own death or something? Pretty sure he was a member of KF and participated in his own thread, a thread that wasn't active for like a half a year before any of this. Did he post any proof that it was KF or examples? Or was it simply assumed like so many other cases? As said before.. Trolling or harassing isn't allowed. ("look don't touch")
Just so people reading this are aware, it's a clear lie that that person "faked his own death or something". As has been posted in another comment, their employer confirmed the death: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/2021/07/23/how-toxic-onli... . I only state it again because this user is spreading deliberate misinformation all over the thread.
It's funny how nobody can actually come up with a media report or and actual death registered by japanese officials.. (Yes the japanese and US government track this kind of stuff and even release official reports.. but guess what's missing from the entire quarter in which near is said to have died)