Live data from Hacker News

A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

newsbeezer.com

441–450 of 509 posts

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#441
post #230

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This just screams negligence to me. This is very much a default mode for ex-USSR countries, especially russia. While russian bureocracy is extremely procedural, it has nothing to do with efficiency or safety (most of the regulations and laws in post-soviet countries are written not to increase safety or utility for population, but for controlling power and money flows and benefeting someone on the top).

I understand that a whole lot of people are upset with Russia right now, but this is completely unsubstantiated.

May I ask how did you come to this conclusion?

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#442
post #434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you stopped beating your partner? Let's see if you dodge this question before I answer yours.

Quoted post unavailable.

Let's see if you accept my answer as I accepted yours.

I don't believe our government thinks that gays should be violently persecuted.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#443

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> there's simply no legal way how a company like Tesla or Mercedes could take responsibility for a crash This seems unlikely to be true, unless of course they weaseled themselves in this position.

Read through the laws about deciding blame in car crashes. There isn't a single word about transferring blame to the manufacturer, and thus it's not possible - and the law specifically says that the driver has responsibility. Nobody had to specifically weasel themselves into it, just the states kept sleeping a decade too long.

I'm not going to read through law texts, but I'm sure that there are provisions for the case where the manufacturer made a design error and is responsible for a crash.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#444

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're the one that made it some weird nationality thing. If you hadn't specifically asked about "the japanese", we'd be talking about chess programmer vs. robot engineer.

Lol? > but I assume that in the japanese case there are some engineers that have implemented some safety and are supervising [0] > that made it some weird nationality thing Oh pesky me! [1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32210363 [1] https://imgur.com/a/wi2tf0N

Because in the comment they were replying to you asked "Would you scold Japanese the same". This is conversation 101.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#445
post #90

It's Russia we're talking about. In Russia, the default mode of answering any complaint is "it's your own fault, we're not responsible, go away". It's not only on the big political scene - it's everywhere, from a village grocery store to a national federation. If you admit any mistake and any responsibility for anything, you're an idiot and a "loch" (pronounced the same as Scottish lake, but means a person to be take…

It used to be like this, in the 90s and 00s. Mainly it was a result of lower class guys getting rich after the events of 1991. It’s not like this anymore, at least not that common. Stop spreading lies, please. Saying that it’s a “culture-wide” is insulting.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#446
post #442

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quoted post unavailable.

Let's see if you accept my answer as I accepted yours. I don't believe our government thinks that gays should be violently persecuted.

No post body was provided.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#447
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As in illustration, I'll relay you an actual story that I read from one Russian blogger (who witnessed it himself and I trust him that he did): The scene is a couchette car in an overnight train between two Russian cities (a very popular mode of transport in Russia). It's late at night, so most people are preparing to sleep or sleeping already, so it is pretty quiet. Except for the two slightly drunk guys in one end…

That's nothing. I once read an actual story on a US aggregator site. The scene is a guy whose knowledge of anything outside his country is lacking. A relatively common occurrence around where he's from. After being bombarded with all kinds of propaganda for decades he'd easily believe almost anything on the topic. Especially after several months of extreme 24/7 antagonism due to a horrible war. That's how culture wor…

I assume you mean me. But which country do you mean? I lived in several. I grew up in a culture I am describing. I still maintain contact with many people living there. I base my conclusions on my experiences and data I gathered for decades. You base your conclusions on ignorance and stereotypes - you have no other choice since you don't know me. But you try to mock me - unsuccessfully, of course, because you don't know anything - maybe you should spend a bit of time on gathering your own information instead.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#448

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> AGI alignment is a vastly bigger problem But also far less likely to happen anytime soon. A bigger danger is when someone thinks a machine is sentient or "semi-conscious" (whatever that means) and naively uses it to do tasks it shouldn't.

I don't think you nor anyone else knows when AGI is likely to happen. I also don't think that incorrectly believing a machine is sentient when it is not is a "bigger danger." Again, an improperly aligned AGI could kill the entire human race. I'm not sure what harm incorrectly believing a machine is sentient might do, but I don't think it would be as bad as human extinction or enslavement which are both real possibili…

> I don't think you nor anyone else knows when AGI is likely to happen.

Sure. But since I am an AI research I'd imagine I'd have a good leg up on the average person. I'm at least aware of the gullibility gap. Lots of people think it is closer than it is because they see things doing tasks that only humans can do but really your pets are smarter than these machines.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#449

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Read through the laws about deciding blame in car crashes. There isn't a single word about transferring blame to the manufacturer, and thus it's not possible - and the law specifically says that the driver has responsibility. Nobody had to specifically weasel themselves into it, just the states kept sleeping a decade too long.

I'm not going to read through law texts, but I'm sure that there are provisions for the case where the manufacturer made a design error and is responsible for a crash.

This isn't the case though, the car works as advertised and licensed, the problem here is that the law makes the driver responsible for something they shouldn't be.

Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent

#450

Earlier quoted context omitted.

France had been ruled by kings, and before that, the Roman Empire for thousands of years, and then one day we had a revolution and became freedom-loving leftists. Same can happen in Russia -indeed, same DID happen in Russia, until the USSR turned into a totalitarian state under Stalin. Also, the US can totally have a multi-party system if they reform their electoral system. [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duver…

But the ones who decide on reforming the system are the two parties - who don't want to dilute their power to other parties. Thus: it'll never happen.

Once again, don't underestimate the American people. If they get mad enough, they'll storm the capital and demand electoral reform at gunpoint.

The French kings weren't keen on democracy, and the Russian Czars weren't keen on communism. Yet they still happened.

Post reply on HN