Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This just screams negligence to me. This is very much a default mode for ex-USSR countries, especially russia. While russian bureocracy is extremely procedural, it has nothing to do with efficiency or safety (most of the regulations and laws in post-soviet countries are written not to increase safety or utility for population, but for controlling power and money flows and benefeting someone on the top).
I understand that a whole lot of people are upset with Russia right now, but this is completely unsubstantiated.
A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
441–450 of 509 posts
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you stopped beating your partner? Let's see if you dodge this question before I answer yours.
Quoted post unavailable.
I don't believe our government thinks that gays should be violently persecuted.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#443Earlier quoted context omitted.
> there's simply no legal way how a company like Tesla or Mercedes could take responsibility for a crash This seems unlikely to be true, unless of course they weaseled themselves in this position.
Read through the laws about deciding blame in car crashes. There isn't a single word about transferring blame to the manufacturer, and thus it's not possible - and the law specifically says that the driver has responsibility. Nobody had to specifically weasel themselves into it, just the states kept sleeping a decade too long.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're the one that made it some weird nationality thing. If you hadn't specifically asked about "the japanese", we'd be talking about chess programmer vs. robot engineer.
Lol? > but I assume that in the japanese case there are some engineers that have implemented some safety and are supervising [0] > that made it some weird nationality thing Oh pesky me! [1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32210363 [1] https://imgur.com/a/wi2tf0N
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#445It's Russia we're talking about. In Russia, the default mode of answering any complaint is "it's your own fault, we're not responsible, go away". It's not only on the big political scene - it's everywhere, from a village grocery store to a national federation. If you admit any mistake and any responsibility for anything, you're an idiot and a "loch" (pronounced the same as Scottish lake, but means a person to be take…
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#446Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#447Earlier quoted context omitted.
As in illustration, I'll relay you an actual story that I read from one Russian blogger (who witnessed it himself and I trust him that he did): The scene is a couchette car in an overnight train between two Russian cities (a very popular mode of transport in Russia). It's late at night, so most people are preparing to sleep or sleeping already, so it is pretty quiet. Except for the two slightly drunk guys in one end…
That's nothing. I once read an actual story on a US aggregator site. The scene is a guy whose knowledge of anything outside his country is lacking. A relatively common occurrence around where he's from. After being bombarded with all kinds of propaganda for decades he'd easily believe almost anything on the topic. Especially after several months of extreme 24/7 antagonism due to a horrible war. That's how culture wor…
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#448Earlier quoted context omitted.
> AGI alignment is a vastly bigger problem But also far less likely to happen anytime soon. A bigger danger is when someone thinks a machine is sentient or "semi-conscious" (whatever that means) and naively uses it to do tasks it shouldn't.
I don't think you nor anyone else knows when AGI is likely to happen. I also don't think that incorrectly believing a machine is sentient when it is not is a "bigger danger." Again, an improperly aligned AGI could kill the entire human race. I'm not sure what harm incorrectly believing a machine is sentient might do, but I don't think it would be as bad as human extinction or enslavement which are both real possibili…
Sure. But since I am an AI research I'd imagine I'd have a good leg up on the average person. I'm at least aware of the gullibility gap. Lots of people think it is closer than it is because they see things doing tasks that only humans can do but really your pets are smarter than these machines.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#449Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read through the laws about deciding blame in car crashes. There isn't a single word about transferring blame to the manufacturer, and thus it's not possible - and the law specifically says that the driver has responsibility. Nobody had to specifically weasel themselves into it, just the states kept sleeping a decade too long.
I'm not going to read through law texts, but I'm sure that there are provisions for the case where the manufacturer made a design error and is responsible for a crash.
Re: A chess robot in Moscow has broken the finger of its human opponent
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
France had been ruled by kings, and before that, the Roman Empire for thousands of years, and then one day we had a revolution and became freedom-loving leftists. Same can happen in Russia -indeed, same DID happen in Russia, until the USSR turned into a totalitarian state under Stalin. Also, the US can totally have a multi-party system if they reform their electoral system. [0] [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duver…
But the ones who decide on reforming the system are the two parties - who don't want to dilute their power to other parties. Thus: it'll never happen.
The French kings weren't keen on democracy, and the Russian Czars weren't keen on communism. Yet they still happened.