Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm pretty sure that "returning to the root Slavic religion" would involve offering massive cow sacrifices to the thunder god Perun in exchange for long life and prosperity. Not sure if that's what you had in mind, though!
Many of us offer sacrifices today, too. In most Slavic countries, it is customary to slay and eat a pig on certain holidays, like Christmas and our Slava. In the US you kill turkeys for Thanksgiving. How different is that compared to other "sacrifices"?
Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
141–150 of 255 posts
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty sure Serbian swapped vs- > sv-, the word is not related to "svit" (it's a folk etymology). Russian vs'ak "everyone" = Serbian svak "everyone"
I cannot respond without looking into what grounds are there to believe svet in proto-slavic is not related to sve. No one speaks proto slavic, so it is all conjectures based on languages that were spoken more recently. I believe linguist academics are citizens of their countries, and their interpretations of things in the past are influenced by languages they speak.
Not really. Written Slavic exists since 9 century and it was spelt vs- already back then. Serbo-Croatian is an outlier here because all other Slavic languages have vs-.
Baltic languages are related to Slavic and Old Prussian had "wissa" for "all" (not "siva")
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
S- didn't become za-. It's just a different choice of preposition in Russian. S utra = "starting from the morning" Za utra (utrom) = "after the morning" Both have a right to exist, just slightly different original meanings.
That's your opinion, let it be different from mine
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#144Earlier quoted context omitted.
S- didn't become za-. It's just a different choice of preposition in Russian. S utra = "starting from the morning" Za utra (utrom) = "after the morning" Both have a right to exist, just slightly different original meanings.
That's your opinion, let it be different from mine
For example, some Russians say "v ogorode" ("in the garden"), while others say "na ogorode". We don't say "v" somehow got "distorted"/morphed into "na". Some dialects simply choose to use a different, unrelated preposition in the same context.
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's your opinion, let it be different from mine
That's not an opinion, that's how basic Slavic morphology/grammar works. For example, some Russians say "v ogorode" ("in the garden"), while others say "na ogorode". We don't say "v" somehow got "distorted"/morphed into "na". Some dialects simply choose to use a different, unrelated preposition in the same context.
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a speaker of Croatian (southern Slavic) and Ukrainian (western Slavic), both Slavio and InterSlavic are bad from the Croatian POW, but InterSlavic is definitely a better choice in either case. Many word forms in InterSlavic just seem like strangely archaic versions of Croatian, but might pass as "just strange" for Ukrainian.
Interslavic seems just as understandable to me. Sometimes I wish all slavic people had one country, one language. Let's call it Slavia.
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
Russian just is not a great example of a Slavic language. It is a Slavic language in general yet way too different from the rest of them for a number of reasons.
> Russian just is not a great example of a Slavic language. i am not sure what you mean but russian is by far the biggest slavic language in terms of number of speakers. i also think it is the biggest in terms of number of litterary and academic works
From my west-slavic (Polish) perspective I can understand Czech, Slovakian (a bit harder) and Ukrainian semi-ok. But Russian is way, way harder (there are some similar words but most are alien to me).
I didn't have chance to listen to south slavic languages so I don't know how similar they are to west slavic ones.
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#148Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem with panslavism is that Russians would have majority, and Russian states were almost always authoritharian and oppressive.
We had rather brutal monarchies in the West, too. Colonialism was not altruistic trip around the globe. Almost all former European monarchies, from England to Belgium, were authoritarian imperialistic countries.
Re: Slovio, an international simplified Slavic language
#150Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not an opinion, that's how basic Slavic morphology/grammar works. For example, some Russians say "v ogorode" ("in the garden"), while others say "na ogorode". We don't say "v" somehow got "distorted"/morphed into "na". Some dialects simply choose to use a different, unrelated preposition in the same context.
Are you trying to teach me Russian? Let your opinion be yours.
I can give an example from Germanic languages.
Old English: tōdæġ (modern English "today")
Swedish: idag "today"
Dutch: vandaag "today"
Same root ("day"), same meaning ("today"), but different languages chose different prepositions/prefixes (to-, van-, i-).
Just like with s- vs. za- in Russian/Serbian.