> then maybe you will understand a bit better why the likes of Patreon cutting off support for the defenders is effectively taking sides.
It obviously affects the conflict; there's really no option not to play for them. I just honestly think that "it's for the right side" is a really bad justification to directly fund weapons. There are better ones in this case, no doubt, but the one the initial comment I replied to made wasn't one.
And I can also see why they don't want to start doing so; once they do, they are either in a position to fund less clear-cut wars or to decide which side in a war is right and both are positions they really don't want to be in. So it's not quite true that it costs them nothing to support the Ukraine (even though, just to be clear, we're in agreement that it would have been the right thing).
> they just made it to my shitlist, not a cent through their company, ever.
Well, they're on mine, too, so no argument here.