Live data from Hacker News

Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

pidgin.im

261–270 of 461 posts

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#261

There is a trick to using Pidgin in Termux, it is not userfriendly but it runs. $ pkg search finch Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done finch/stable 2.14.1 arm Text-based multi-protocol instant messaging client finch-static/stable 2.14.1 arm Static libraries for finch $

Sorry in Android with termux.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#262
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And you assumed everyone who wanted a desktop chat app used pidgin and nothing else? Because there were plenty of "multi-service" apps. It's just that Pidgin was the more popular among Linux users.

Yeah, Trillian was, by far, most common among the general public (the non-programming, non-techy types). Honestly, Pidgin was pretty niche, I don't know of any non-techies that used it.

Multi-chat clients had limited appeal by design because non-techies were more likely to just pick whatever service was the most convenient to them. Seems expected that it would be the techie folks consolidating all their friends because they were more willing to use multiple services than the average non-tech user. Even Trillian was fairly niche by comparison, just far less so than Pidgin.

Pidgin's psychic mode plugin was great fun, though.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#263
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

I recall it well. Was never quite as stable as the native clients, so I just used those. And then Steam came along with chat and that was that.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#265

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kids can't use computers. http://www.coding2learn.org/blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-co...

"She reevaluated her categorisation of me. Rather than being some faceless, keyboard tapping, socially inept, sexually inexperienced network monkey, she now saw me as a colleague. To people like her, technicians are a necessary annoyance. She'd be quite happy to ignore them all, joke about them behind their backs and snigger at them to their faces, but she knows that when she can't display her PowerPoint on the IWB s…

Probably, but I'd say it's not far off from reality for many behavior and perspective wise. I think it unnecessarily transfers the behavior to misogyny (could easily be anyone/any sex), but that's the perspective many hold for those in tech: a means to an end. The addition of sex in the description definitely wasn't needed.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#266
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

Does not everyone still use it? I and most of my friends do. They are also responsible for my favorite bug report ever: https://bugs.gentoo.org/35890

> I hope to see this bug make the GWN for an example of what an INVALID bug looks like

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#267
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

I miss Adium Trillian used to be like Pidgin and Adium on Windows but then they went and made its own IM service.

Adium still works on modern macOS, in fact, I'm running it right now for IRC. And there's already an issue on github asking about M1 support :)

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#268
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My daughter (who teaches math at HS) asked me to create educational videos for her kids who don't know how to work a computer. They only know phones.

They use one at home to browse the internet and work? I can certainly understand that one would do so on the go, but it seems extremely cumbersome to do a school assignment on a phone keyboard.

Not many are writing papers on their iPhone, but many do on iPads. Mouse and keyboard support are good and so are the apps.

I think the average person that doesn't need to do heavy editing, coding, etc. can get by with an iPad Pro w/ some accessories.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#269
post #49

Does nobody remember Pidgin? It was one of the first things a lot of people installed on their machines 15 years ago along with Firefox. We used it as an alternative client to AOL Instant Messenger and Yahoo Messenger. It used to be called GAIM.

Does not everyone still use it? I and most of my friends do. They are also responsible for my favorite bug report ever: https://bugs.gentoo.org/35890

I would use it if it supported Facebook and whatsapp, because those are the services that my contacts are on.

Re: Pidgin – A Universal Chat Client

#270
post #199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would suggest they never knew how to use computers. Computers are general purpose devices, which is lost on the general population who only ever need to check emails and post on social media. Smart phones fit this perfectly. Let's leave the general computing devices for people who actually need that power, just like the early days.

Awfully condescending opinion. How about making _general_ computing devices more accessible via UI/UX to the _general_ public? That doesn't seem like such a crazy idea.

> How about making _general_ computing devices more accessible via UI/UX to the _general_ public?

That's pretty much what the iPad is. A general purpose computing device but easier to use and with tighter security than a PC. At some point you end up sacrificing versatility for accessibility to the masses.

Post reply on HN