Live data from Hacker News

Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

sparrowsnews.com

121–130 of 170 posts

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#121
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd love to hear more elaboration on that, or a link to an article. As someone way out of my depth it seems almost silly that they wouldn't be able to figure that out through a combination of throwing expertise and money at it and spycraft.

Related: China can finally manufacture ballpoint pens. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38566114

[flagged]

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#122
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That'll probably happen in the long term. In the short term, China might answer by completely banning US companies from the Chinese market. I don't see anything to win here. Probably every large company, including those from the US, have some kind of production facilities, storage or supplies in China. China applying similar restrictions would probably be a worse hit for the US than the current situation is for China…

I doubt the Chinese will take any rash, knee-jerk reaction here. They are very predictable and will stick to what is in their best interest. Since there is no democratic government either, these decisions are not at risk of changing - unless XiJinping loses a coop, which at this point is an impossibility.

if you think about it, we have reached a time in which we are all benefiting from china having a cool head about them and patience. it's really highlighting the power vaccuum that's happening.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#124
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That was already China's stated goal in their "Made in China 2025" initiative. > The initiative encourages production of high value products and services, like aerospace and semiconductors, to help achieve independence from foreign suppliers. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025

What other countries have long term plans and initiatives and effectively execute on them as China does?

Chinas success in doing this can in large part be traced to the unwillingness of the U.S and the west to challenge and stop the pure theft of IP from basically all advanced industries and unfair trade practices. This has enabled an immense transfer of IP which gives China an amazing foundation to build upon. Now China has to do the final push to become self reliant, but it's much more feasible than it was say 10-20 years ago.

As far as i am aware no country except for different eras of communism(specifically Soviet) have operated somewhat effectively on production output plans on the scale of entire economy.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#125
post #5

Long term I feel China is going to work around these sanctions and such and end up completely independent of US tech.

Yes. But will they then innovate at the same rate?

Why wouldn't it accelerate it? Their innovation has either already surpassed that of the west or is going that direction.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#126
post #5

Long term I feel China is going to work around these sanctions and such and end up completely independent of US tech.

How long will take them to do it without stolen tech from companies from US, Europe, Korea and Taiwan?

What makes you think that the "theft" of tech will slow down at all?

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#128

Can someone provide more context about what SoC they are going to use for their phones from now on as this is not really clear from the article.

They will use a mix of Qualcomm chips for high end phones and Kirin chips made by SMIC for lower end phones. At least that's my guess.

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#129
post #117
post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

why does that matter if the outcomes are comparably despicable? In fact that seems _more_ damning to the US people

>why does that matter if the outcomes are comparably despicable How are they comparable? The black incarceration rate in the US is around 2.3%[1], meanwhile the incarceration rate for Uyghurs is estimated to be around 10%-15%[2][3]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarceration_in_the_United_St... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xinjiang_re-education_camps [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_i…

USA has 4% of the world's population and 25% of its prisoners. We are the worst on earth, in the history of earth. No wonder we invented "whataboutism".

Re: Huawei CEO: After September 15 No More Kirin Chips

#130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the same time the US caused (directly/indirectly) the death of 400-800k people in Iraq. Somehow there is a double standard regarding human rights. China is despicable but I think that the moral ground of the US regarding this kind of issue is quite shaky.

We are a democratic country, don't support a war, vote for someone in office who does not support it. China on the other hand if you don't support putting muslims in concentration camps, you end up there yourself

The US is not a true democracy. The voting system is such that there can never be more than two parties that have any chance of winning at all. Meanwhile, both of the two parties are legally private corporations that are allowed to select candidates any way they choose.

As a consequence, if those in control of both parties want something (which was the case for the Iraq War), there is absolutely no way for the people to vote against it.

This is without even talking about how consent is manufactured.

Post reply on HN