Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't prohibit speech. That's it. Repugnance is part of life. If you suppress speech, you only push it underground. Light is the best disinfectant. Daryl Davis, a black musician, attends Klan rallies ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORp3q1Oaezw ). By knowing who to speak with, he's helped people out of that racist pit. I extend speech so far to include calls to violence. Then you know who to watch and who to protect…
Honestly I think this just doesn't work out this way in reality. First of all, we know that deplatforming racists/fascists does actually help to stop the spread of racist/fascist ideas. Secondly, and I think this is the more salient point, encountering racist/sexist/transphobic/whatever speech as a person who is the target of such rhetoric is immediately harmful and othering, especially when these views aren't active…
Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
161–170 of 258 posts
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is nothing independent with Brazil’s court. They are just dismantling the executive powers so they and their own can be kept on power. In Brazil, the Supreme Court is filled by presidential choice. Brazil had 25 consecutive years with social democratic and socialists presidents, so that every justice currently have been put there by them. Now that democracy turned to the right-wing, the losers aren’t accepting…
True. You cannot expect the judicial to be apolitical if it is appointed by the other two highly political branches of government. But we pretend it is apolitical in Brazil and in the US.
A judge may be liberal or conservative but it doesn’t follow that they would represent a party platform.
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where did you read the technical arguments? The article doesn't mention them. In fact, the article is very light on information, and only left me confused about the situation, like why are the presidents supporters calling for a coup? And how does blocking a dozen accounts change anything, really? Would the people behind them not simply open more sockpuppet accounts?
> why are the presidents supporters calling for a coup Acts asking for a militar coup have been happening for the last few years among the radical right. Their demands are not clear enough, so most news reports are about them happening and events surrounded them, such as the president appearing in some of them. [1] [2] --- I'm not going to guess what they want, so let's just translate what their banners say. Hopefull…
Brazilian living abroad here. This one is particularly hilarious/concerning because they keep screaming "censorship" against the supreme court orders and censoring the press was one of the policies instituted by the AI-5 decree.
I lived through the second half of the dictatorship. I'd rather lock up those who ask for one than see my country under one.
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#164Censorship is so repugnant, yet so complicated. What should be prohibited to be said, if anything? Who draws the line?
They need to answer for that.
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#165Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#166Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#167I am glad that Brazil's court still remains independent. Looks like Bolsonaro, should borrow couple of tips from his friend Narendra Modi. Modi, dismantled the institutions in India systematically to guarantee his long lasting power. e.g. The only official from the election commission who didn't give a clean-chit to Modi for his election campaign violations during last election was greeted with Income Tax raids on hi…
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#168Very glad I'm not Facebook. No matter what choices you make, millions (or billions) will hate you. Is decentralization the only solution, if it even is one?
I agree. You may not agree with Zuckerberg's position of not censoring content (beyond the obscene), but it's probably the smartest position for the business. As soon as you start saying "well, we'll censor stuff that isn't accurate", you've opened a Pandora's box of every single interest group hammering you on every single decision and in the end everyone thinks you're screwing them over.
I don't think this accurately describes Facebook's position. They have deleted several people for essentially pure ideological reasons, including people who they readily admit violated no rules.
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Brazilian here. Unfortunately I wouldn't call them independent. They simply represent the other side. Brazil is not as united behind Bolsonaro as the media makes out to be.
I'm originally from Turkey, and that's also the case with Erdoğan. I mean, they wouldn't be dictators if everyone agreed with them, no? The big problem arising from the stark polarization is that there's no uncontaminated news sources anymore. Many argue that news should be political anyway but I really miss reading stuff that doesn't fit 100 percent to a single agenda.
Re: Brazil Bolsonaro: Facebook told to block accounts of president’s supporters
#170I am glad that Brazil's court still remains independent. Looks like Bolsonaro, should borrow couple of tips from his friend Narendra Modi. Modi, dismantled the institutions in India systematically to guarantee his long lasting power. e.g. The only official from the election commission who didn't give a clean-chit to Modi for his election campaign violations during last election was greeted with Income Tax raids on hi…
You're glad that this independent court is censoring people?
Using social media to threaten physical violence against Bolsonaro's opponents has been a theme all throughout his time in power.