Live data from Hacker News

IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

bloomberg.com

71–80 of 134 posts

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#71
post #44

I find myself less interested in whether or not something is a recession or not. I mean, sure, the numbers of the economy are going down, but the big numbers don't necessarily mean much for anyone's personal life. Of course it can; losing your job is no fun. But the big reason why the Great Depression was so bad, is that we didn't have any social security back then. Unemployed meant having no income at all. No health…

I think you are underestimating the effects of real depression even in a wealthy first world country. Finland went through depression in the 90s when the Soviet Union collapsed and it left behind a cohort of people who never really recovered or gained employment.

You seem to think that being poor in a first world country is just skipping few vacations and luxury items but otherwise life can be wonderful. I think you severely underestimate how poor people can get even in countries with strong social security, like the nordic countries.

Also the idea that misery is mostly political decision sounds just silly. Most of Europe hardly recovered from 2008 financial crisis and are already cracking under the demographic shift, baby boomers retiring. Add a covid depression into the mix and things can get really bad. There's just not enough money in the economy to share for both the retirees and a large number of unemployed. This can cause a vicious cycle as the increasing social spending will increase taxes, increased taxes will go to increased labour cost, increased labour cost will drive down demand on European goods increasing the unemployment even more etc...

There's always a cynic to rain on your optimism :)

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#72

I think historians will look back at COVID-19 as a textbook way not to handle an emergency. They will point out that 99% of deaths were related to economic effects of our response, not the disease itself. Hundreds of millions will starve or die in failed states in an economic slowdown, while only hundreds of thousands die of disease.

Sorry what? Are your numbers the world or US? In either way I think it's just impossible, no? There can't be hundreds of millions of deaths in the US due to starvation after this I don't think I need to justify this claim. (if you disagree let me know) and I'm willing to bet that death from the disease in the whole world is more than a million easily. OK so the only possible interpretation is you're saying the shutdown is going to kill a lot of people from economic effects in poorer countries? I think this is nonsense. The shutdown is most prominent in richer countries, where it's unlikely to cause massive deaths to starvation. Whether the economic effect has a large toll or not, it will not be 3 orders of magnitude more than the disease, that's just hogwash.

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#73
post #51

As a total dummy on macroeconomics, I find myself having the positive take "hey, we were probably moving towards some recession anyway, might as well get it over with in one go". I'm saying this because the graphs go up again in the not too distant future. Besides the obvious personal suffering that is going to be the consequence of this event on at least the short term, and under the uncertain assumption that we're…

hey, we were probably moving towards some recession anyway,

That's a take that is gained from reading two many doom and gloom writers and not looking at the data.

The data shows that economies - on average - expand and have done consistently, long term since the renaissance.

Once you look at that, you see recessions as mistakes. Most large ones since the start of the 20th century have been caused by errors in the capital markets (1929, 1987, 2008) or commodity price shocks (1970s).

Perhaps the run up in stock prices should have been corrected. But that would have been a recession caused by a financial market correction, so another 2001 "dot com crash" style thing. Nothing like this.

is there any merit towards my naive optimism

By most measurements this is the biggest economic shock since 1929 (and possibly larger). It's the first time we've have economic activity stop this quickly across so many industries all across the world ever (perhaps the black death in the 1300s was similar because many farms went unharvested because of the lack of labor - up to 80% of people died in some areas[1]).

It's possible this will turn around quickly. We certainly stopped things quicker than I would have believed was possible a 4 months ago.

But provided you understand that is an optimistic view and isn't really supported by history it's ok.

[1] https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-economic-impact-of-the-black...

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#74

This certainly feels real to me. Yesterday, I was laid off from my job at Easypost. We had a very big and very painful layoff because my company took on way too much leverage. The circumstances of COVID19 were tough to foresee but I really wish we hadn't taken on so much debt while times were good. I have experience in Go, Ruby, Python and I'm excited to hack again.

Nothing personal, but how is it not a company's fault to take on tons of leverage and not have cash reserves? I know this is typical SV growth mindset, but it isn't conventional financial wisdom. Seems to me companies need to get lucky if they go growth at all costs, because if you havent flipped the profit switch before a recession, your balance sheets are too red.

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#75

I think historians will look back at COVID-19 as a textbook way not to handle an emergency. They will point out that 99% of deaths were related to economic effects of our response, not the disease itself. Hundreds of millions will starve or die in failed states in an economic slowdown, while only hundreds of thousands die of disease.

How do people die from an economic slowdown? Maybe in poor countries but I don't think in a developed country an economic slowdown should kill anybody.

Poverty leads to higher suicide rates, e.g. https://www.usnews.com/news/healthiest-communities/articles/... . It also leads to people being generally less healthy and dying earlier: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181123135003.h... . If poverty leads someone who's currently 10 years old to die five years earlier, then in terms of loss-of-life-years it's similar to the loss if e.g. an 80 year old is killed by the virus.

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is it a depression if it's only been a few months? Also the IMF article predicts a 3% contraction for 2020 and a 5.8% growth in 2021, so by what definition is this a depression?

>Also the IMF article predicts a 3% contraction for 2020 and a 5.8% growth in 2021, so by what definition is this a depression? I wonder how they get those numbers. At least half the US economy is in shutdown right now. Two months of that is equivalent to one month of the whole economy being shutdown; to 1/12th of annual GDP lost, or around 8.3%. Add another month and its 12.5% of output lost.

>I wonder how they get those numbers.

They explain in their article: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/04/14/we...

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#77
post #44

I find myself less interested in whether or not something is a recession or not. I mean, sure, the numbers of the economy are going down, but the big numbers don't necessarily mean much for anyone's personal life. Of course it can; losing your job is no fun. But the big reason why the Great Depression was so bad, is that we didn't have any social security back then. Unemployed meant having no income at all. No health…

Look into unemployment system tech. In my state, its physically impossible to access it. Whenever you call or go online, it is straight up broken and dozens of contact attempts have yielded nothing.

Our economic system is not nearly robust enough for these suddenly 5-10% unemployed and underemployed citizens. We can not "easily get through this if we want to".

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#78
post #73
post #51

As a total dummy on macroeconomics, I find myself having the positive take "hey, we were probably moving towards some recession anyway, might as well get it over with in one go". I'm saying this because the graphs go up again in the not too distant future. Besides the obvious personal suffering that is going to be the consequence of this event on at least the short term, and under the uncertain assumption that we're…

hey, we were probably moving towards some recession anyway, That's a take that is gained from reading two many doom and gloom writers and not looking at the data. The data shows that economies - on average - expand and have done consistently, long term since the renaissance. Once you look at that, you see recessions as mistakes . Most large ones since the start of the 20th century have been caused by errors in the ca…

this is also different because there isn't an economic causal factor. we intentionally stopped everything. that didn't happen in 1929 or 2008 or the 70's, we collectively got together and said shut it down until we get a hold on this disease

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#79
post #44

I find myself less interested in whether or not something is a recession or not. I mean, sure, the numbers of the economy are going down, but the big numbers don't necessarily mean much for anyone's personal life. Of course it can; losing your job is no fun. But the big reason why the Great Depression was so bad, is that we didn't have any social security back then. Unemployed meant having no income at all. No health…

> We can easily get through this is we want to. Skip a vacation, but a luxury item less...

Wow that is pretty out of touch with reality. If you have a household where two people were all of a sudden out of a job at the same time with absolutely no warning or preparation, having to pay for two kids, a mortgage and no prospect to find a job in the next few months then I'm afraid skipping a vacation or not buying a luxury item will not cut it! And this shit doesn't just happen to the poor. If you are a restaurant manager on a high salary but all of a sudden the restaurants are forced by the government to be closed and before they are allowed to open again might have gone bankrupt, and the other person is in a high paying office job (fashion buyer for a big brand) and has been sacked because the entire fashion industry is having a fucking heart attack now then both people might be out of work for nearly a whole year before they can get back to anything like what happened before our governments decided to completely shred our livelihoods to the grounds for some yet known overall good. These people will be fucked for years and can be lucky if they are not going to loose their homes, get divorced and become alcoholics.

Re: IMF Says Great Lockdown Recession Likely Worst Since Depression

#80
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hey, we were probably moving towards some recession anyway, That's a take that is gained from reading two many doom and gloom writers and not looking at the data. The data shows that economies - on average - expand and have done consistently, long term since the renaissance. Once you look at that, you see recessions as mistakes . Most large ones since the start of the 20th century have been caused by errors in the ca…

this is also different because there isn't an economic causal factor. we intentionally stopped everything. that didn't happen in 1929 or 2008 or the 70's, we collectively got together and said shut it down until we get a hold on this disease

Yes exactly. This is completely uncharted, especially when you consider it is world wide, almost instantly.

There have been national strikes in some countries before - perhaps we should be looking at the impact of them to try to understand this.

Post reply on HN