Live data from Hacker News

JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

iflscience.com

141–150 of 178 posts

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#141
Why do airlines even need to know your name (much less your gender — remember the press ballyhoo a few months ago when some airlines expanded their list from male and female)?

I can see that they might want to know that each passenger has paid for the seat but that’s about it.

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve just flown London to Aberdeen (UK) and back with no need for ID. You certainly can still do this internally. An exception may be if your terminal is mixed in with international flights, then you’ll be lumped in with them at security.

Well yes, because UK is a weird country in that you guys have no official ID system. People either use their driving licence or a passport, and neither is mandatory to have. Most other EU countries just issue everyone with an ID card so 100% of population is covered.

Why is that weird - its weird that post ww2 that there wasn't more of a backlash against id cards in Europe.

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#143
post #118
post #110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven’t flown into Paris recently but there are plenty of exceptions: Berlin’s not beautiful either (though it’s one of my favorite airports). But still the standard in Europe seems higher in general than North America.

I like Berlin Tegel, but Berlin Schönefeld always seemed to me to be its low-budget brother.

Yeah I was speaking about Tegel. If you fly out of the main rotunda, it's great because every gate has its own security and bag drop so there's no long waits, even if it's busy. Schonefeld is like any other budget airport.

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#144
post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think we need to be more precise about what exactly is spooking us and why. What's spooking me is the normalization of facial recognition technology for identification without adequate public agreement over what the limits of its applications should be. A machine recognizing me is a lot different than a human recognizing me. If a machine can recognize me, there can be cameras posted at every street corner, and so…

So it's still not the problem that a machine can recognize you, but rather that somebody is tracking and storing such recognitions. Which is an entirely different thing. The former is a technological reality. It's impossible to legislate away devices who can do that. Tracking and storing personal data on the other hand, is very much within the reach of regulation. The GDPR for example restricts this. Even if somebody…

> It's impossible to legislate away devices who can do that.

It is actually be pretty trivial to legislate restriction of these devices. We do that all the time.

edit: Especially on planes where shampoo-technology is pretty much outlawed...

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#145
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you insist that facial recognition technology could not be regulated? It's possible for anyone to go to a garden supply store and find the ingredients to make home made explosives. In principal we can't stop people from doing so, but that doesn't mean we can't make it illegal and impose penalties on anyone who does it. It's a technological reality that I can watch videos on my phone while driving, but we can s…

Making bombs in your backyards is much less popular and much more consequential than recognizing images. And image recognition happens completely in silicon. There is no way to know from the outside if a device is recognizing patterns in image data, much less differentiate between recognizing faces or dog breeds.

I'm not following your argument. There's also no way of knowing from the outside if a device is storing identifying information to be shared with advertisers or foreign governments. What's special about classifiers which makes them unregulatable?

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#146
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So it's still not the problem that a machine can recognize you, but rather that somebody is tracking and storing such recognitions. Which is an entirely different thing. The former is a technological reality. It's impossible to legislate away devices who can do that. Tracking and storing personal data on the other hand, is very much within the reach of regulation. The GDPR for example restricts this. Even if somebody…

Why do you insist that facial recognition technology could not be regulated? It's possible for anyone to go to a garden supply store and find the ingredients to make home made explosives. In principal we can't stop people from doing so, but that doesn't mean we can't make it illegal and impose penalties on anyone who does it. It's a technological reality that I can watch videos on my phone while driving, but we can s…

[deleted]

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You could fly with guns and smoke cigs in planes in the 50s-60s, that was true freedom, right ? Planes were hijacked all the time, and back then they weren't nearly as many planes as now. [0] > so much of what made air travel fun It's not supposed to be "fun", flying isn't a right, it's a privilege that enabled mass tourism which is an ecological and cultural plague. People take easyjet/ryanair like they take their c…

In what sense are they "hell" and how come you think free movement is a privilege - that sounds a bit elitist. Free movement is a right in the EU BTW

Free movement is a right yes, but flying is not...

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#148
post #143
post #118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like Berlin Tegel, but Berlin Schönefeld always seemed to me to be its low-budget brother.

Yeah I was speaking about Tegel. If you fly out of the main rotunda, it's great because every gate has its own security and bag drop so there's no long waits, even if it's busy. Schonefeld is like any other budget airport.

Somehow I manage even month-long trips with just carry-on. With the sole exception of the time I cycled from Hoek van Holland to Zürich and needed to get back to the UK in a hurry, I think I’ve not had a check-in bag drop since I was a kid.

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The machine recognizing you was the harder problem. That's the "Minority Report" stuff that people thought was in the _far far_ future that we don't have to worry about constantly. Storing and using that model across various devices is trivial. So if we've done the hard part, the easy part is _definitely_ going to be done. There's no doubt about that. States, companies that can convince the state that they somehow ne…

"Minority Report" was about something that Humans couldn't really do, meaning to look into the future, and they even needed psychics to do it... Good luck trying to advance science by avoiding to invent anything that can recognize image!

Taken metaphorically we’re not far away. Imagine if we come to trust ML to make decisions for us in everyday life, and we build a system which can predict with high confidence that someone will commit a mass shooting. Is it so hard to believe that might be acted on?

Re: JetBlue has started using facial recognition instead of boarding passes

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We’ve given up so much freedom Arguably it's merely been taken from us. There are plenty of who object, and the TSA is wildly unpopular. That makes little difference to the fact that the pace continues ever further. I don't mean to be defeatist, but I don't think a sternly worded letter has ever made much of a difference, and probably won't in the future. The only caveat is that when REAL ID takes effect and entire…

Why isn't this a political issue? I think it's because politicians are increasingly distracted by re-election, and end up delegating the actual work of governing to enormous bureaucracies, public and private. This delegation comes gladly, for two reasons: first, the risk of mistakes is very high, so the fewer decisions you actually make, the better, and second, the delegated organizations are very good at keeping the…

Our press' is complete shit. It focuses on trivialities instead of real political issues. Not their fault though, it is an economic reality forced upon them.
Post reply on HN