Earlier quoted context omitted.
The issue isn't and never was with grading. No one is giving higher grades than they should in those UK universities that I worked with - the issue is specifically with lecturers being instructed to write exams in such a way that most people pass, because doing otherwise is bad for the department and for publicity. Which results in exams which are stupidly easy for anything that doesn't have "engineering" in the name…
I envisaged creating exams would come under the remit of an examination board just as it does for A levels and GCSEs.
In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
131–140 of 248 posts
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
The purpose of universities seems to have shifted from providing academic research and learning to simply being another stage of school There’s no “seems” about it, 50% of school leavers going to university was an explicit policy goal. There’s no way to reconcile an institution of higher learning with one that has to accept anyone that applies
That makes no sense. It seems to me it is an elitist view that when you provide a service to the unwashed masses, it must be of lower quality. I believe it is false. Curricula don't have to be easier if you have a large student body, and graduation requirements don't have to be lower. Taking in more students does not inhibit service quality, up to the capacity of the school, which can be easily scaled by hiring more…
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#133Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Curricula don't have to be easier if you have a large student body, and graduation requirements don't have to be lower. Only if everyone became a lot more skilled than their grades imply. Academic achievement is not be a perfect measure, but if you go from the top 3.4% of the population to the top 50%, the only possible situations are: 1) everyone is doing a lot better at school now 2) graduation rate goes down 3)…
It is not even the “top” 50%, because what of those who are perfectly capable but just don’t want to go to university? It is just 50% of the general population.
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just can't imagine how that would work? Maybe for some "core" modules - sure. But if you have a Russel group university with an industry leading ML course, where the professor behind the course is the leading researcher in the area - who is going to write the exam for it? The "problem" here is standardization(or lack of it) - and it's actually very good that university courses are not standardized.
You just paper swap with another uni. Oxford can hand it's engineering paper to Cambridge and see if it's hard enough etc. Not hard to do, it's just peer review for exam papers
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
I have no idea what you two are talking about. Could you enlighten those of us that don't know?
He started the "Heterodox Academy" which argues for and promotes ideological diversity (i.e. both left and right) in universities.
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know this is a trite comment, but no, you still pay through taxes. The state has no money. I too live in a country with tax-financed universities.
There is quite a big difference between students alone paying 100 % (or more like 500 % in the US) and every citizen in a country sharing the price between them. Not only is it cheaper overall per capita but you also get much better tuition when schools don't go where they make the most money but concentrate on teaching and research. Look at how research in the US is today. Research what might make big money and when…
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
That makes no sense. It seems to me it is an elitist view that when you provide a service to the unwashed masses, it must be of lower quality. I believe it is false. Curricula don't have to be easier if you have a large student body, and graduation requirements don't have to be lower. Taking in more students does not inhibit service quality, up to the capacity of the school, which can be easily scaled by hiring more…
Universities used to be elitist in that only the smartest got in.
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Curricula don't have to be easier if you have a large student body, and graduation requirements don't have to be lower. Only if everyone became a lot more skilled than their grades imply. Academic achievement is not be a perfect measure, but if you go from the top 3.4% of the population to the top 50%, the only possible situations are: 1) everyone is doing a lot better at school now 2) graduation rate goes down 3)…
That presumes That the top 3.4% really were just the smartest - not the also the wealthiest and best connected. There is probably both some dilution of talent and also more competition from all levels of society. And as to point 1. In the UK at least there is no doubt many many more are doing a lot better at school nowadays. Schools have evened up and pupils work far harder as most jobs require qualifications.
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know this is a trite comment, but no, you still pay through taxes. The state has no money. I too live in a country with tax-financed universities.
When someone says tuition is free or that healthcare is free what they mean is that using these services doesn’t cost out of pocket expenses and doesn’t lead to debt. In this sense those services are free.
Re: In UK universities there is a daily erosion of integrity
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
The purpose of universities seems to have shifted from providing academic research and learning to simply being another stage of school There’s no “seems” about it, 50% of school leavers going to university was an explicit policy goal. There’s no way to reconcile an institution of higher learning with one that has to accept anyone that applies
That makes no sense. It seems to me it is an elitist view that when you provide a service to the unwashed masses, it must be of lower quality. I believe it is false. Curricula don't have to be easier if you have a large student body, and graduation requirements don't have to be lower. Taking in more students does not inhibit service quality, up to the capacity of the school, which can be easily scaled by hiring more…
This was for the sole reason of increasing cash flow and I know several of the Chinese students that I did my Masters with were paying more than ten times what I was for the same course which both myself and our lecturers were ashamed of.
It may not be all Universities but even ten years ago it felt that they had become less about excellence in teaching and more about printing money.