Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Catalonia, more so than Estonia, has a distinct culture What makes you say that? Estonia is a protestant country of Finnic people speaking a Finno-Ugric language that is completely unrelated to even the Indo-European language family. Soviet, like Russia now, was a Eurasian empire mostly made up of Orthodox Slavs speaking a Slavic language. These are quite distinct cultures, at least as different as Germany and Franc…
You're right that Estonia was not the best possible example in terms of lingual similarity, and Lithuania would've served the purpose better in terms of recent history. Sweden and Denmark are a great choice, but I think the Swedish War of Liberation is too far back in history to be acknowledged as a relevant example today. I was mostly attempting to point out our inconsistencies in supporting the independence of so m…
Like Catalonia we had not been an independent country for a very long time. In fact Norway existed as an independent country so far back that Spain didn't even exist as a country then.
Like Catalonia, when Spain gained its independence it had not previously existed as an independent country. The same could be said about the Netherlands. Netherlands like Catalonia was also once part of Spain. Until it declared independence from Spain, it had never existed as a country.
In fact this has been a problem for dutch identity, in that there really is no clear way to identify dutch national identity before independence from Spain.
Which I thing brings me to the point, that ultimately it is about what people feel themselves.
Despite not having been independent for almost 600 years, Norwegians still felt like they were a different people than Swedes or Danes.