He's extremely lucky.
In Canada, and in a growing number of jurisdictions - there is 'harassment' so long as the victim feels as if there was.
If a girl feels harassed - then that's it. Guilty.
It's a deep breach of our fundamental rights, in that crimes should be determined objectively, and not subject to the whims and feelings of a victim.
Obviously, this is a complex problem, and a lot of actual harassment does take place and it needs to be dealt with.
But so many authorities screw it one way or the other: by ignoring it, or handing out wicked penalties in knee-jerk righteous fear.
The Github case, in particular is pernicious: the CEO lost his job after trying to reasonably handle supposed harassment case, when there was absolutely no indication of it even happening.
Ironically, this girl, Julie Horvath - is a pariah and a terrible example for women - is now working at Apple.
Ellen Pao comes to mind as perfectly the wrong candidate in any way be representing 'women's rights' at work.
The movement needs better leaders/examples.
It also blows my mind that things like this go on - after the girl in this article complained, the other people on the team should have just shut up about it. I mean - there's 'ribbing' and 'fun' but when someone is really hurt by it ... you just stop man. Get on with your jobs.
Also - I'm not sure the 'ask the waitress for the cheque' is really a form of harassment. It's just weird.
It seems as this poor girl really has a case, that said, there's two sides to every story. I guess we should take her word at face value, but it would be helpful to hear about it from other voices.
Pettiness, vindictiveness, and the intersection of 'crude, boorish behaviour' with 'easily offended victims' can sometimes conflate to create bad situations that might seem like harassment (and often really is), but is really about another set of infantile behaviours altogether.