Live data from Hacker News

Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

medium.com

181–190 of 692 posts

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#181
"there was no harassment according to legal definition. "

He's extremely lucky.

In Canada, and in a growing number of jurisdictions - there is 'harassment' so long as the victim feels as if there was.

If a girl feels harassed - then that's it. Guilty.

It's a deep breach of our fundamental rights, in that crimes should be determined objectively, and not subject to the whims and feelings of a victim.

Obviously, this is a complex problem, and a lot of actual harassment does take place and it needs to be dealt with.

But so many authorities screw it one way or the other: by ignoring it, or handing out wicked penalties in knee-jerk righteous fear.

The Github case, in particular is pernicious: the CEO lost his job after trying to reasonably handle supposed harassment case, when there was absolutely no indication of it even happening.

Ironically, this girl, Julie Horvath - is a pariah and a terrible example for women - is now working at Apple.

Ellen Pao comes to mind as perfectly the wrong candidate in any way be representing 'women's rights' at work.

The movement needs better leaders/examples.

It also blows my mind that things like this go on - after the girl in this article complained, the other people on the team should have just shut up about it. I mean - there's 'ribbing' and 'fun' but when someone is really hurt by it ... you just stop man. Get on with your jobs.

Also - I'm not sure the 'ask the waitress for the cheque' is really a form of harassment. It's just weird.

It seems as this poor girl really has a case, that said, there's two sides to every story. I guess we should take her word at face value, but it would be helpful to hear about it from other voices.

Pettiness, vindictiveness, and the intersection of 'crude, boorish behaviour' with 'easily offended victims' can sometimes conflate to create bad situations that might seem like harassment (and often really is), but is really about another set of infantile behaviours altogether.

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#182
post #148

I think commenters who are reacting negatively to this story are reacting to the vocabulary rather than the story. Obviously I'm not a witness, but I tend to believe that these events took place more or less as the author describes them. At the same time, words like "sexism" and phrases like "as a minority..." are a big turn-off to some readers, myself included. This isn't because I don't believe in racism/sexism/xen…

TL;DR know your audience

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#183
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> But does it target everyone _equally_ ? LOL, wat? Each and every case is unique, there is no equal in this. I even gave an example, which has happened to me, to friends, to my wife equally...

> which has happened to me, to friends, to my wife equally... I assume your lying to try and prove a point. Unless you back this up with evidence, one should safely assume you are lying. I don't like doing this, but as someone once said: there are people out there who lie. Especially these days, with the problems of fake news, it's easy to get suspicious.

Fair point. If the situation would have been that bad, I'd probably had it recorded. Thankfully it resolved after talking to them or, in case of a random stranger, friends stood up against them.

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#184

> I had never before encountered this kind of visceral hatred This comment rang some bells for me. Have a friend from the Netherlands who was in undergrad with me, and one day in confidence he told me one of the things he didn't understand most in America is how someone can harbor, and actively maintain, such a passionate hatred for someone they aren't intimately involved with. While this hatred is most definitely pr…

I think this is simply just ignorance on your part and the part of your friend. People all around the world are full of hate. Most countries are still relatively homogenous. Any country where you see some mixing, you'll see the same hate. The Middle East is too easy of an example. Germany, France, etc have a lot of overt hate. The hate in Ireland between the Protestants and the Catholics was very real and they're the…

Naivete is a possibility, but I haven't witnessed it as overt between people in my living in France (Riviera, not Paris) compared to what I've seen in America - However, as I am not a victimized group, this may be reinforcing naivete.

Despite this naivete though, I would be wary of circumstance before making the declaration "mixing of any kind = hate"

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#185
post #132

My brother, as a manager of a big team in Belgium, had once to face a complain to the HR about he harassing a secretary. The reaction of the company was immediate, and in my opinion the right one. They contracted a specialize company to investigate, collect the facts and present their conclusions. The conclusions would be sent at the same time to the alleged victim, the HR and the manager. In this case the conclusion…

github was widely panned for doing the same exact thing.

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#186

"there was no harassment according to legal definition. " He's extremely lucky. In Canada, and in a growing number of jurisdictions - there is 'harassment' so long as the victim feels as if there was. If a girl feels harassed - then that's it. Guilty. It's a deep breach of our fundamental rights, in that crimes should be determined objectively, and not subject to the whims and feelings of a victim. Obviously, this is…

R v Elliott is an interesting case. It contradicts what you are saying in general, but it also shows that the courts imposed strict conditions on a suspected harassment case which severely harmed the defendant's work life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Elliott

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#187
If I was back at the start of my career, I would of dismissed this article and told the author to "toughen up". After all, what's a bit of ribbing among co-workers? Surely she's just being overly-sensitive.

Until I had the (mis)pleasure of working with a truly toxic co-worker did my mindset completely change on the issue of bullying, intimidation, and hostility in the workplace. He was a senior guy, decent at his job. But how he was able to change the dynamic of multiple teams was very offsetting. Communication declined, as people didn't want to go near the team that had the guy that was insulting them everytime on a whim. Workplace politics were on the rise. The common denominator was this guy was involved with every issue. Management stayed quiet and attempted to push it under the rug for a bit, but eventually they had to take notice. It was so relieving to walk in one day to him cleaning out his desk. I remember locking eyes with him one last time and giving him a final unspoken send off with a stern glare. He turned the corner and I never saw him again. My co-workers and myself went out for lunch as a celebration. The amount of relief was incredible. It was like starting fresh again.

Back to the article, I still can't say I fully understand what this woman went through. But just having a taste of how off-putting 1 toxic employee can be really opened my eyes. I can't fathom having multiple employees or even a manager with that type of behavior. I won't comment on gender or racial issues.

Being stressed from work is okay. Some jobs have more stress than others, and at higher frequencies. But being stressed from the people at work is needless stress that compounds on top of the regular work stress that we all accept to some degree when entering a job or role.

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#188
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unions don't exist to improve price discovery per se , they exist to reduce the power imbalance between massive autocratic organizations given great power (for good reason) by the state and individual workers, on a broad set of issues that does usually include compensation.

I'm perfectly happy with that "power imbalance", whatever that means. Why can't the union refuse to protect non-union workers against this "imbalance"? It sounds like the union needs special legally granted monopoly powers to sell me services I don't actually want. The term for that is "rent seeking", actually.

> I don't know what you mean by "free rider problem"

> I'm perfectly happy with that "power imbalance", whatever that means.

> It sounds like the union needs special legally granted monopoly powers to sell me services I don't actually want. The term for that is "rent seeking", actually.

You may want to do some reading on the topic, it seems, if it's interesting to you. You appear to have picked up some ideas and vocabulary, but missed a lot of others. Should be able to find political-economy or labor relations focused econ textbooks that cover this stuff without difficulty, and probably in some cheap older-revision copy that'll be fine for the purpose. A few minutes looking at 200ish-level poli-sci and econ class syllabi should give you a good idea of what kinds of materials you'd want to hunt down, and I'm guessing a skim over a broad selection of that stuff would be helpful.

(EDIT) to give a nutshell description of the power imbalance: it is far more harmful, in the general case, to the individual than to the company when a, say, 500+ person company rejects them as a candidate or fires them, which means they have vastly less leverage in any sort of negotiation, official or otherwise, which may occur.

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#189
post #44
post #12

Preamble: I'm not questioning or talking against the article at all, just making some notes. The problem seems to be real all around the world, which is yet another indicator that most societies are not ready for global market. The only thing I miss from the article: did she try to talk to her harassers directly before going to a manager? Maybe I misread something but it seems like this did not happen, yet this shoul…

I'm astonished this is as high as it is. > did she try to talk to her harassers directly before going to a manager? There are a huge number of reasons why you should not be expected to do this. The harasser can be in a position of authority, for example. Even separately to that (and i understand this is a reducio argument, but..) would you ask an abuse victim to speak to their abuser? No, they go straight to the poli…

> This is a problem that needs fixing, rather than a status quo that needs defending.

This is not a problem that can realistically be fixed. An organization that's going to work for the best interests of employees cannot be paid by the company, nor can it report to the company or someone with whom the company has significant influence. That means unions.

Re: Harassment at Apple: A personal perspective

#190
post #130

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From my mothers similar experiences followed by her unions absolute refusal to help, in a word, no. They exist to parasitically take your money, forcibly take others who don't want to give and really offer very little in return other than more bureaucracy. Your much better off paying a lawyer than a union.

> They exist to parasitically take your money, forcibly take others who don't want to give and really offer very little in return other than more bureaucracy. If we look at historical facts rather than your mothers anecdotes this is incredibly far from the truth.

I remember from a "Free To Choose" video that due to unions there was a huge amount of bureaucracy taking months to fire one worker in the government.

Anyways, that's just another anecdote, what are the historical facts?

Post reply on HN