Live data from Hacker News

Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

syonyk.blogspot.com

211–220 of 367 posts

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think other people would blame Tesla. People don't blame the manufacturer when someone services a car and doesn't put on the breaks correctly and causes an accident.

The media would blame Tesla, they have an agenda.

The media is plural, it has many agendas. So?

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#212

One of the things that makes a car valuable is having a healthy aftermarket. It looks like, from this article anyway, Tesla is doing anything they can to make sure there is no aftermarket for their vehicles. To me, a car that you can't service yourself is worthless. A car that needs the manufacturer's permission to activate is not your car--it's owned by the manufacturer. And, when the manufacturer places a threateni…

You'd think that out of the thousands of people who have already bought one of these cars, there might be one out there with both the skills and desire to actually own what they paid for On the other hand, it could just be that those who want to really own their cars would not consider buying a Tesla anyway, and those who have the skills are too scared of the legal aspects. I think at the moment, electric cars are st…

That's silly. The aftermarket doesn't exist for electrics because so few electrics exist.

People at hacking LEAFs already.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#213
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would wager that 80% of cars that are crushed (which weren't in an accident) could be repaired (if broken) or 'fixed up' to operate better than the last owner thought possible for less than a days work and perhaps a few hundred dollars. I do appreciate your point, but I think people are far too afraid of older cars and they are scrapped too soon. I was hoping to convince some folk in this tech community that old ca…

I feel the same way. I drive a classic Range Rover, and it is a lot of fun. Yes, I spend around $2000 each year getting various components repaired or replaced, but that is enough to keep ahead of entropy, and between loan payments and the higher cost of insurance I'd be spending twice that or more on a newer vehicle. Plus, I have a relatively simple machine with no fancy DRM automation crap that won't report me to t…

Apparently you're 8 times more likely to die if your car is half the weight of the one you have a high speed collision with (sorry from memory no reference, could be bogus). Add to that the over-the-top strength of the Range Rover and even though it's a classic, I think you're going to be more likely to survive in a head on collision than 95% of other vehicles on the road.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#214
post #187

One of the things that makes a car valuable is having a healthy aftermarket. It looks like, from this article anyway, Tesla is doing anything they can to make sure there is no aftermarket for their vehicles. To me, a car that you can't service yourself is worthless. A car that needs the manufacturer's permission to activate is not your car--it's owned by the manufacturer. And, when the manufacturer places a threateni…

> I think we're going to start seeing "jailbroken" Teslas soon after they start falling out of their warranty period. This seems particularly likely for the Model 3, given the likely "everyday supernerd" demographic, and simple missing features like working ODB-II interfaces [1]. 1: http://www.teslamotorsclub.com/showthread.php/17973-Can-Mone...

ODB-II is really super focused on ICE systems though. I'm not surprised they omitted it from an all electric.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is restricting who can service the car supposed to keep the resale value up? It means the prospective buyer will have to pay more for repairs when they're necessary, the cost of which comes out of what they'll be willing to pay for the car.

It ensures that servicing is performed by qualified personnel, thereby mitigating the market for lemons.

Is service by third party mechanics really the dominant factor in creating lemons, and not design or manufacturing defects or abusive driving by previous owners?

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#216
post #137

One of the things that makes a car valuable is having a healthy aftermarket. It looks like, from this article anyway, Tesla is doing anything they can to make sure there is no aftermarket for their vehicles. To me, a car that you can't service yourself is worthless. A car that needs the manufacturer's permission to activate is not your car--it's owned by the manufacturer. And, when the manufacturer places a threateni…

> Tesla is doing anything they can to make sure there is no aftermarket for their vehicles This seems to fly in the face of evidence, considering Tesla directly facilitates aftermarket sales: teslamotors.com/models/preowned

That's resale, not aftermarket parts/modifications

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#217

One of the things that makes a car valuable is having a healthy aftermarket. It looks like, from this article anyway, Tesla is doing anything they can to make sure there is no aftermarket for their vehicles. To me, a car that you can't service yourself is worthless. A car that needs the manufacturer's permission to activate is not your car--it's owned by the manufacturer. And, when the manufacturer places a threateni…

this is incorrect. Teslas have very little depreciation. Trying to buy a preowned or used is still very pricey. At least at this time. I think people that buy 100k car are less inclined to care about the after market value. The people probably also don't care to service the car themselves. Even at 40k I think this probably still holds true.

This is mostly due to pent up demand from very wealthy customers who are not price sensitive. When Tesla (or competition) can satisfy new car demand and start selling to less wealthy consumers, the story will change

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'd think that out of the thousands of people who have already bought one of these cars, there might be one out there with both the skills and desire to actually own what they paid for On the other hand, it could just be that those who want to really own their cars would not consider buying a Tesla anyway, and those who have the skills are too scared of the legal aspects. I think at the moment, electric cars are st…

At least for me, it's not about souping the car up, it's about doing repairs and maintenance myself because a) it's cheaper and b) it's more convenient. If I knew I was going to have to drive a car to the dealership anytime something went wrong, I would not buy that car. It's a big hassle (especially if the dealership is any distance away) and almost always outrageously expensive for anything outside of warranty. And…

Among many, many other models both in and out of production, Teslas are not the best choice for hot rodders. Got it.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It ensures that servicing is performed by qualified personnel, thereby mitigating the market for lemons.

Is service by third party mechanics really the dominant factor in creating lemons, and not design or manufacturing defects or abusive driving by previous owners?

Tesla can offer a stronger warranty if they know more about the cars' life. The car is full of sensors.

Re: Why I think Tesla is building throwaway cars

#220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are so much more optimistic about the motivations of these "providers" than I that I am struggling to find any common ground where we could have a discussion. All I see are new opportunities for exploitation and control driven by rent-seeking behavior.

If the market is open and competitive then your concerns should be addressed by other vendors. There is no need, nor is it possible, for every product to be appropriate for every consumer. The 'motivation' for these providers is to achieve a return on investment, they can only do that by creating a value proposition that the market approves, which is not the same things as a value proposition that everyone approves.…

As good get more complex, the industry naturally becomes limited tona few less than competitive competitors.

Open design products allow small companies to compete on add-ons like maintenance and repairs, even though they can't offer whole cars.

Post reply on HN