Viewing profile — chadgpt2
chadgpt2
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 05, 2026, 6:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 4
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About chadgpt2
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48144675
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48144658
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48069824
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48069811
Honest question: Is there anything scary about this apart from lowering your ISP's reputation score?
-
comment
Comment #48069789
Both are terrible for privacy so it comes down to which one has a nicer screen now. :( I'd rather have Google check an Apple phone attestation than have Google check a Google phone…
-
comment
Comment #48069759
Luckily the marketplace of money will ensure that businesses who block their customers shrink and businesses who don't block their customers grow.
-
comment
Comment #48069750
Violating ToS isn't illegal in most cases. Companies just put scary looking clauses in their ToS to discourage you from doing things they don't like.
-
comment
Comment #48069741
How would the phone camera know the domain name of the website displaying the QR code it's scanning?
-
comment
Comment #48069733
Was this FOSS or commercial? If it's commercial software, you're paid to make it work, no matter how stupid that may be, and forced stupidity isn't your problem. If it's FOSS, you …
-
comment
Comment #48069711
Do people expect that Instagram can't read their Instagram private messages? I don't think people expect that. And E2EE is not nearly as cheap as the HN crowd likes to pretend—how …
-
comment
Comment #48069672
Interesting idea, thanks for the link
-
comment
Comment #48069660
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48069619
Insider trading is a part of it. If someone bets a few billion dollars that America will invade Iran, the probability shoots up to 98%, even though nobody else thinks it will happe…
-
comment
Comment #48069607
It's like Uber getting on a phone call with the city to ask if it's legal to run taxis that aren't taxis.
-
comment
Comment #48069595
Can you steelman TikTok's argument?
-
comment
Comment #48069588
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48069540
Do you have your own web page? Not just you, the parent commenter, but also you, the random HN reader. If not, why not? It's fine if it's a bit sparse. Most people don't have a who…
-
comment
Comment #48069510
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48069470
It sounds that you spend money and receive a service which cannot be converted into an investment. Are the people housed, in the end? Is the housing market distorted by rampant spe…
-
comment
Comment #48069460
It is a problem if, no matter where someone is, they are always asked to leave that place. At that point you cannot special-plead the subway system.
-
comment
Comment #48069449
The USSR did massively reduce homelessness by providing homes. They discovered the surprising fact they if someone has a home they are not homeless.
-
comment
Comment #48069440
Another categorical imperative is "everyone who is bullied by the city and only allowed to sleep in the transit system shall sleep in the transit system" This one is fine. If the c…
-
comment
Comment #48068128
Doesn't matter anyway since ICE also targets legal migrants, permanent residents, and citizens.
-
comment
Comment #48068100
It was my understanding that if a federal officer breaks a state law, such as murdering someone, the state can arrest them.
-
comment
Comment #48068051
No, the main reason is because NAT is terrible and restoring the end to end principle is important if we want the internet to stay not separated into server networks and eyeball ne…