Really embarrassing being European nowadays.
And 'us' can be read as is, or capitalised.
771–780 of 878 posts
Really embarrassing being European nowadays.
And 'us' can be read as is, or capitalised.
By this logic the hardware manufacturers or even almighty God can be found responsible. God should have stopped them.
Obviously god has no such restriction, but he's probably outside French jurisdiction, and i don't think they have an extradition deal in place.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why are you assuming tech savy people care primarily about end-to-end encryption?
Maybe because tech-savvy people understand the need and importance of encryption? There's of course always the exceptions that say they don't care about privacy, but that is fortunately usually a small group, at least in the tech-savvy world.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use telegram for some group chats, but I'm not sure why tech-savvy people would like it so much – messages are not end-to-end encrypted which makes it an inferior choice compared to even whatsapp
Hot take: E2EE is overrated! Almost all conversations that most people have are benign. I used telegram to follow journalists (essentially as a twitter replacement), how would E2EE benefit my use case?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Telegram is not E2E encrypted.
so i should be liable if it is a plain text messaging github side project?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This would imply that just E2EEing everything would give you a free pass not to moderate anything, which seems very naive. I doubt the judges would care about their self-imposed technological limitations.
If I sell shovels, it's not a self-imposed techical limitation that I don't have a way to detect and prevent anyone from doing something illegal with a shovel. Even after the technological means exist to include an intetnet connected spy device in every shovel. Secure message passing is no different. The "shovel", the thing one might sell, is just the application of some math which does something and not any of the i…
This is what happens when you refuse to hand over the keys.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you, please, elaborate? Wasn't it their main feature and the selling point?
Telegram e2ee FAQ covers the nuances https://tsf.telegram.org/manuals/e2ee-simple
https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2024/08/25/telegram...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are the downsides to telegram providing default E2EE? Seems like a no brainer to have it as a default feature for the product.
I think they don't support cross-device syncing or automatic backups of E2EE chats, so it's about minimising friction by default. Telegrams main focus is UX, unlike Signal which prioritizes security at the expense of UX.