Live data from Hacker News

Honda is killing its EVs

techcrunch.com

541–550 of 919 posts

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#541

Honda is setting itself up for failure on the second disruption sweeping the automotive industry: the software-defined vehicle (SDV), which has core capabilities that can be upgraded and improved over time. No thank you. Not sure why the author frames this as a good thing. They've been bamboozled by the automakers and have got it backwards - you're buying a vehicle that already has the capabilities, but are disabled,…

What core capabilities of a car need to be improved anyway ?

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#542

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mexico City needs this badly. It would be beautiful if it wasn't for the smog and noise of traffic.

Inversion layer there will still trap ev particulate unfortunately

What is EV particulate? Like brake or tire dust?

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#543

Earlier quoted context omitted.

BYD just released a car that charges 250mi of range in 5min for exactly this reason.

Or instead of paying money for a car that still fills up slower than a gas one, has all the extra issues that come with EVs, and hope that there is charging infrastructure in my area, I could just buy any ice car made in the last 35+ years.

Extra issues? Or "different" issues? The jury is still out on whether ICEVs or EVs are better overall, but despite being a less mature technology my EV is the best car I've owned so far. Seems to me that EVs win pretty easily in the long run.

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#544
post #534

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My biggest peeve with hybrids is that it gives consumers the mistaken impression that they're going to have to replace the batteries in their EV. Most hybrids aren't liquid-cooled (although that is changing), and the smaller size means that a hybrid puts a lot more cycles per mile on the battery than an EV does. Which in practice means that a hybrid battery lasts about 100,000 miles whereas an EV lasts about 250,000…

...are there 300k mile Priuses out on the road and being used?

Oh yeah. There is a famous one in austrian taxi service with over 600k miles.

https://www.electricbike.com/the-curious-case-of-the-600000-...

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#545

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live in Tokyo, and the air is not that clean close to highways: large diesel trucks pollute a lot, and also small motorbikes/scooters pollute horribly because they don't seem to require any emissions controls at all. The main thing keeping the air clean here is the proximity to the bay, along with the fact that there just aren't that many private cars in the first place, since most people take public transit and do…

Large trucks do not pollute a lot (there are strict standards to that matter). While they do pollute obviously, there is no viable substitute to it. EV truck is a dream at this point in history. Amount of private cars in Tokyo is huge. Pollution near expressways in rural japan far from bays is next to nothing, so having it close to ocean does help a little. Small motorbike/scooters are not allowed on expressways.

> EV truck is a dream at this point in history.

you should tell china.

https://www.electrive.com/2026/01/23/year-end-surge-electric...

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#546

"Here, Honda is setting itself up for failure on the second disruption sweeping the automotive industry: the software-defined vehicle (SDV), which has core capabilities that can be upgraded and improved over time." I'll pay triple for a non software defined vehicle that doesn't track me and can't be touched by the dealer once I purchase it. My one SDV (Tesla) is still on FSD from 2023 because the newer versions are t…

I think self-driving cars are inevitable: I agree with that statement. And once they are here and cheap and safer than humans, they'll become universal. I don't know when that is, but it's less than 100 years from now.

However I don't think Tesla's SFD is inevitable, or any other carmakers; for all I know, they're so bad they shouldn't be sold. It's early days. This or that brand might go out of business. But within 100 years, self-driving will conquer the world.

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#547
post #462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> At a societal level, EVs are generally better than ICE cars. Cite your sources, please > cars that can automatically fix a "recall" with an over-the-air update are generally better than recalls that will wait to get fixed until an owner schedules an appointment to have the car serviced. If a "recall" can be fixed via software, doesn't that mean just shitty software to begin with? And that usually happens only when…

>Cite your sources, please we need sources for the fact an electric motor, all other things being equal, is better than a combustion engine? If you agree that people in general value the health of their lungs that alone is sufficient reason. It's also becoming quickly a question of geopolitical resilience, running your transport system on dinosaur juice coming from regions where people blow each other up is bad in pa…

> an electric motor, all other things being equal, is better than a combustion engine?

This is not the core argument. Motors maybe superior - we can agree on that. The power source (batteries) and the environmental impact they have - that has always been the core argument. [1]

Again, without sources, these are just opinions.

Sources:

[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30046087/

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#548
post #282

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those numbers include PHEV cars. As a BEV owner, I consider PHEV to be more ICE than BEV. BEV numbers are not as impressive, but we're getting there, slowly but surely. A bit slower than I would've hoped.

My Phev is about 80% ev. It uses a tank of gas a month, replacing a nearly identical vehicle (similar body and same engine - though other things have changed) that needed one or two tanks a week.

sadly thats not the norm. Various recent studies from the EU based on real world vehicle data show that actual savings from the PHEV category are about ~20% less emissions than a pure gas version. Aka, they are just gas cars. Despite manufacturers claiming ~70-80% for emissions credits. The category is today kind of a scam, in aggregate.

It doesnt have to be - bigger battery strictly-series EREVs would likely show better numbers than the weak-ev phevs sold today.

Re: Honda is killing its EVs

#549

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I want to say this with the caveat that I am generally a person who always contends with the contradictions of living in a capitalist-imperialist country and my own distaste for it. So this doesn't come from a place of American exceptionalism writ large, but I am a firm believer the we did get this part right: Public lands and culture of the ability to access wild places, whether for hunting, fishing, hiking, camping…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protected_areas_of_Chi...

> China has more than 10,000 protected areas, covering eighteen percent of the country's land

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_areas_of_the_United_...

> As of 2022, the 42,826 protected areas covered 1,235,486 km2 (477,024 sq mi), or 13 percent of the land area of the United States.

Can you be more specific? China has areas of protected wilderness, and you can in fact go to many of them and be in nature. What's the practical difference?

Post reply on HN