I can't help but feel like you think you've found some chink in my arguments and so are continuing to push this single point, though it is ultimately completely irrelevant to the thread.
Search "virus hijack" on google and you'll see that it is a very common colloquialism. These vaccines similarly commandeer the celular machinery to manufacture proteins from a human engineered mRNA sequence that is not found in isolation in nature. And to the cells detriment. This absolutely fits the common definition of hijacking (like hijacking a server) and, furthermore, while the actual function of cellular machinery manufacturing proteins is "natural", you are disingenuously stretching the definition of the word natural when you include injections of human engineered (unnatural) substances in unnatural quantities for unnatural purposes (human cells under no circumstances naturally manufacture exclusively spike proteins).
I'd really appreciate it if you'd stop spamming this thread with this irrelevant and fallacious argument.
Edit: in fact, while we're on the subject of what is and is not natural, I don't believe it would be reasonable to claim that human immune systems evolved to handle what are essentially megadoses of an inflammatory and likely cytotoxic protein that is also being expressed on tissue surfaces. That doesn't guarantee that this is dangerous but for the bajillionth time, the point is there is more than enough known and unknown complexity in this delicately balanced system to allow for the possibility that hundreds of millions of rushed vaccinations could easily turn out to be a minor or major fuckup in the long run.