Earlier quoted context omitted.
The use of the term Nazi is deeply stupid. But Israel does need to chill a bit and care more about their global PR. But they are surrounded by countries that really DO want to destroy them so I can understand why they are so trigger happy. The way they destroyed Hezbollah was brilliant. The Hamas charter is a giant Islamist Jew-hating rant.
It’s hard for me not to have a “black pilled” view of this region. They’ll never have peace until they actually want it. There’s too many nuts on every side whose whole purpose for living is to see anyone who isn’t just like them dead. Unfortunately the regular civilian who live in this region suffer for it. The only way out I can see would be some kind of cross border cross culture mass uprising against all the fana…
Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
361–370 of 370 posts
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#362Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, what it comes down to is whether you can admit that Palestine and Gaza are being occupied by a colonial power that doesn't have the right to be there, has consistently engaged in ethnic cleansing, genocide of entire villages and war crimes since its foundation, and that resistance to it will continue until that fact changes considerably. No-one living in a Western bubble, least of all Israel, gets to set the term…
The asymmetry is that Hamas uses human shields to great effect, whereas the IDF doesn’t and couldn’t because their foe wouldn’t care. It’s all you really need to know. >resistance to it will continue ‘Resistance’ is an incredible word to summarize October 7th. Is it possible you haven’t looked into the full sordid details of that day? It is beyond comprehension. If you’re disturbed by hate-fueled violence perpetrated…
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#363Earlier quoted context omitted.
It’s hard for me not to have a “black pilled” view of this region. They’ll never have peace until they actually want it. There’s too many nuts on every side whose whole purpose for living is to see anyone who isn’t just like them dead. Unfortunately the regular civilian who live in this region suffer for it. The only way out I can see would be some kind of cross border cross culture mass uprising against all the fana…
People really like to gloss over how deeply rooted Jew hatred is in Islam. The Koran contains blatant hate speech against Jews and this is the primary reason why Muslims resent the existence of Israel so irrationally
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#364Earlier quoted context omitted.
This one? https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up... I don’t know what you think it’s trying to say, but I will admit that my own ideological bent probably makes it read a lot differently to you. I have a half-non-serious idea that these small scale wars (compared to WWI / II) that pop up around the world from time to time occur to maintain at least some state of force-readiness and to make use o…
> I have a half-non-serious idea that these small scale wars (compared to WWI / II) that pop up around the world from time to time occur to maintain at least some state of force-readiness and to make use of ordnance with a limited shelf life. That's a key pillar of the Western Military–industrial complex. > Everything else is just a ruse, and people like you and myself are unwittingly divided over meaningless conflic…
If you don’t know much about a person how do you know they’re a religious zealot white nationalist conservative?
Because of what someone else told you?
Fatherless homes.
That’s how women tend to act when they feel they’ve been slight: straight for the reputation.
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#365Earlier quoted context omitted.
People really like to gloss over how deeply rooted Jew hatred is in Islam. The Koran contains blatant hate speech against Jews and this is the primary reason why Muslims resent the existence of Israel so irrationally
It's interesting how this always comes up one way and not the other way around, as if it's asymmetric.
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#366Earlier quoted context omitted.
It helps separate principled people from others. Some will say "countries must never be invaded, occupied, or annexed", others will add "... if it's done by Israel, but I'll absolutely ignore/support it if it's done by Turkey, Russia, China". And the latter group is fundamentally not principled, they are biased to the core, and this is an easy way to tell them apart. It's like people who are against capital punishmen…
Maybe my principle is "I should stand up against any current invasion, gradually caring less over twenty years". The two options you present aren't the only two that exist.
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#367TIL what the green names mean on HN (new account). I once worked in an Information Operations group. It has left me deeply suspicious of the verisimilitude of online personae. One of the things I appreciate about HN is the ability to check whether I'm talking to a human, and whether they have a cohesive sentiment.
Mods do their best here, but there's no way to check whether you're talking to a human (on HN or any other digital messaging service)
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#368Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please stop ignoring everything I say about Hamas with "Israel bad too". Do you or do you NOT want Hamas to replace Israel with a ISIS style Islamic state, as that is their goal. Have you ever read their insane rant of a Charter?
First, I ask that you please stop ignoring everything everyone is saying about israel with " hamas bad too" [0][1][2][3] . Remember, israel was the topic until someone engaged in whataboutism w/r/t hamas. 'But hamas' here, on the topic of israel's bad behavior, is a tu quoque fallacy. Someone's bad behavior cannot be solely defended on the basis of 'but so and so did X' , and israel's behavior in particular (oppressi…
Re: Bitchat for Gaza – messaging without internet
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
First, I ask that you please stop ignoring everything everyone is saying about israel with " hamas bad too" [0][1][2][3] . Remember, israel was the topic until someone engaged in whataboutism w/r/t hamas. 'But hamas' here, on the topic of israel's bad behavior, is a tu quoque fallacy. Someone's bad behavior cannot be solely defended on the basis of 'but so and so did X' , and israel's behavior in particular (oppressi…
Hamas is is a totalitarian theocracy that kills opponents to it.