Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I honestly do not think you are having a healthy dialogue or coming to terms with your own inherent biases yourself. Since you so clearly perceive those would you mind exposing them? > My own two-cents are that left-wing violence and anger is partly to blame for both his rise and the deeper polarisation we are now seeing since it enabled the alt-right to play the victim and fight a war of optics [0]. That does not…
> frankly, I have a hard time coming to terms with > people self describing as 'moderates' who voted > for Trump, that is some kind of cognitive dissonance. > Trump is about as far away from moderate as it gets. That's not what I'm arguing so I don't expect you to come to terms with that. You cannot be moderate and vote for Trump. I do think you can be moderate and point out that there are certain tactics used by the…
The instances you quote have nothing whatsoever to do with debating this in a facts and reason based way on an internet forum.
If people are concerned with their kids getting wounded when attending mass rallies of whatever plumage then it is time to spread the word that whenever you assemble a mob, whether it is the 'good guys' or the 'bad guys' does not matter, the mob is its own enemy when panicked and when two mobs encounter each other violence is the predictable outcome.
That idiots then use this to incite further violence is an obvious conclusion without much weight in practice.
Each side will do what they can to victimize themselves and lay blame with their opposition, it has been so since the first man picked up a stick to wage war on his neighbors.