Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

github.com

261–270 of 331 posts

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You must be using it wrong, because I'm getting 100x the work done and currently at 1.5 million MRR with this SAAS I vibe coded over the weekend. After I solved entrepreneurship I decided to retire and I now spend my days reading HN, posting on topics about AI.

You're still manually posting? All of my HN posting, trolling, shitposting and spamming is taken care of by a fleet of bots I vibecoded in the last 5 minutes.

You gest, but I know people who've done this.

"I gotta be present." Me: Reenacting the Malcolm Reynolds too many responses meme.

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#263

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I get it. LLMs are cool technology. I don't think many of you have legitimately tried Claude Code, or maybe you're holding it wrong. I'm getting 10x the work done. I'm operating at all layers of the stack with a speed and rapidity I've never had before. And before anyone accuses me of being some "vibe coder", I've built five nines active-active money rails that move billions of dollars a day at 50kqps+, amongst lot…

Man I really thought this was satire. It’s phenomenal that you can gain 10x benefits at all layers of the stack, you must have a very small development team or work alone. I just don’t see how I could export 10x the work and have it properly validated by peers at this point in time. I may be able to generate code 10-20x faster, but there are nuances that only a human can reason about in my particular sector.

It is satire! They have been doing this bit for a while and people keep falling for it lol

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People will always go along with a removal of friction even against their benefit. It's natural bias, we have a preference for not spending energy. It's why we pay stupid amounts for takeout when it's a button away, it's why we accept the issues that come with online dating rather than breaking the ice outside, it's why there's been decades scams that claim to get you abs without effort... LLMs are the ultimate frict…

> stupid amounts for takeout Aw hell. You found my vice and my own cognitive dissonance here. If I want to truly stand by my convictions, I should probably cook more and log off. Waiting for signs that the tides are turning and that people are beginning to value a slower, more methodical approach again isn't doing anything in the current moment to stave off the genuine feelings of dread that have honestly led to some…

Stand strong. Plenty of us working towards healthy offline communities.

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#266

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I get it. LLMs are cool technology. I don't think many of you have legitimately tried Claude Code, or maybe you're holding it wrong. I'm getting 10x the work done. I'm operating at all layers of the stack with a speed and rapidity I've never had before. And before anyone accuses me of being some "vibe coder", I've built five nines active-active money rails that move billions of dollars a day at 50kqps+, amongst lot…

Man I really thought this was satire. It’s phenomenal that you can gain 10x benefits at all layers of the stack, you must have a very small development team or work alone. I just don’t see how I could export 10x the work and have it properly validated by peers at this point in time. I may be able to generate code 10-20x faster, but there are nuances that only a human can reason about in my particular sector.

> I just don’t see how I could export 10x the work and have it properly validated by peers at this point in time.

In my experience, the people who 10X their output with Claude Code fit one of two categories:

1. They're not really taking the time to understand the code they're submitting. They might do a skim over the output and see that it looks reasonable and passes tests, but they aren't taking time to understand the code as if they were pair programming. Only when it breaks and the LLM can't patch it up quickly do they go in and fully understand the code.

2. They moved very slowly before Claude Code. I've had some coworkers who would take 2-3 days to get a simple PR out because, to be frank, their work days weren't full of a lot of work. Every time they'd run into a question they'd stop and then bumble around for a few hours until they could talk to the ticket creator about it. They'd get tired of working on a task by 2PM and then save the rest of the work for tomorrow. They'd get an idea and decide to rewrite the PR the next day, and on and on with distractions. When they start using Claude Code the LLM doesn't have the same holdups, so now every time where they were getting stuck or tired before is replaced by an LLM powering through to some solution. Their cognitive load is reduced so they're no longer freezing up during the day. They aren't really becoming 10X engineers like they think, but really just catching up to normal pace

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#267

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Man I really thought this was satire. It’s phenomenal that you can gain 10x benefits at all layers of the stack, you must have a very small development team or work alone. I just don’t see how I could export 10x the work and have it properly validated by peers at this point in time. I may be able to generate code 10-20x faster, but there are nuances that only a human can reason about in my particular sector.

I noticed that too. At start. It vaguely reminded me of the famous Navy SEAL copypasta.

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch?

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anthropic models haven't been far ahead for a while. Quite a few months at least. Chinese models are roughly equal at 1/6th the cost. Minimax is roughly equal to Opus. Chinese providers also haven't had the issues with uptime and variable model quality. The gap with OpenAI also isn't huge and GLM is a noticeably more compliant model (unsurprisingly given the hubristic internal culture at Anthropic around safety). CC…

Claude is exceptionally better at long running agentic sessions. I keep coming back to it because I can run it as a manager for the smaller tasks.

...and codex is at least 10x better than Claude. I don't even bother starting a new session when working on a feature, a single compaction is basically unnoticeable. You have to compact several times to start needing to remind the model about a rule or two.

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#269
post #262

I'm more surprised that OpenAI is extremely subsidising their ChatGPT subscriptions. With Plus you can do a lot more than with Calude's x5 Max. Is it an expense they just can afford, while people have not migrated over from CC?

Just trying to win over market share I assume. OpenAI is willing to subsidize to try to get people to switch from CC to Codex, and the best incentive is to offer more tokens at a lower price.

Re: Claude Code login fails with OAuth timeout on Windows

#270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mind if I use this as a copypasta for the future? This checks off every point people bring on LinkedIn and elsewhere. In all seriousness though, writing code, or even sitting down and properly architecting things, have never been bottlenecks for me. It has either been artificial deadlines preventing me from writing proper unit tests, or the requirement for code review from people on my team who don't even work on the…

> artificial deadlines preventing me from writing proper unit tests, or the requirement for code review from people on my team who don't even work on the same codebase as I do on a daily basis I have never experienced this, and it sounds remarkably dysfunctional to me.

[flagged]
Post reply on HN