Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Bebop, a company Google acquired last year for $380 Million > When Google decided to bring Diane Greene on full time to run Google Cloud, they had to purchase her company in order to facilitate that Well, that's an expensive hire.
I think it already paid off. She on-boarded Snap, Apple and Netflix Edit - I am impressed with Diane Greene. She donated all of her take from acquisition of her company - http://www.businessinsider.com/diane-green-donates-150m-to-c...
Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
231–240 of 357 posts
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
All true. And to be honest I have always been very turned off by their boastful "We only hire 50/50 Male/Female developer team." It's so in your face, it's like "why not hire the best person for the job?" Or when I see their internal job ads here, its like "Gee, I wonder if this is for a Male engineering role or a Female engineering role," or "Hope they didn't hire a bunch of dudes last week." So for a variety of rea…
I've never seen the claim made that Lever only hires for 50/50 male/female developer teams. Can you cite a source on that?
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stay away from Lever. It's a slick web application along the lines of the fanciness of Asana's interface. What it isn't is a sane applicant tracking system. It doesn't reliably notify you when candidates apply. It supports virtually zero job board integrations. It very much wants you to adapt to it, with very little support for the other way around. The interface is over-complicated to the point of being unusable for…
"It doesn't reliably notify you when candidates apply." I get e-mailed every time candidates apply for a role I'm following. I actually disagree with most of what you're writing and I've been on it nearly full-time for the past few months. Lever has been awesome, coming from Greenhouse. It's also a much newer product, so as another commenter pointed out, it sounds like you missed some of the features that might have…
This has been a recurring, long term problem with Lever -- and my company has used it for 3+ years (and still does, although we are finally transitioning off). It's to the point where it's someone's job to log into Lever every 2-3 days and nag hiring managers to respond to applicants -- and the hiring managers almost never know that they have applicants based solely on Lever.
Lever's preferred use case is also to have full access to Google Apps e-mail accounts, to provide end-to-end e-mail capture for when you talk to candidates. In theory maybe I want that behavior, but I really don't want to grant that control.
I'm glad that Lever works for you, but it really doesn't work for me. Using it is honestly one of the biggest mistakes we made as a company, and it's irrational that we stuck with it for so long (out of a sense that all ATSes suck so what's the point). It's never worked well for us, and it is fundamentally not the right product fit for us. I'm surprised to hear that it is the right fit for anyone, but it sounds like you have had a very different experience with it.
For my company, I can say with certainty that we have missed out on candidates, had an overall harder time in the hiring process, and had a MUCH harder time sourcing candidates due to its poor job board integration. That said, if you like Lever, don't let me stop you from continuing to like and use it.
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Would you propose that they just... stop scaling? Stop making new products? Yes. I want an economy where we have millions of tiny companies, each doing one thing, and doing that well. Like the German Mittelstand.
Having Amazon split up into dozens of smaller companies for different categories just sounds really annoying to me.
One entity would run the marketplace, another entity would do the Amazon Basics products, and AWS would be a third entity.
A single entity controlling the market place, products, distribution platform, and infrastructure just screams of antitrust.
Generally, no company should be allowed to both run a marketplace, and offer products on it.
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think it already paid off. She on-boarded Snap, Apple and Netflix Edit - I am impressed with Diane Greene. She donated all of her take from acquisition of her company - http://www.businessinsider.com/diane-green-donates-150m-to-c...
Does Netflix use Google Cloud? Or do they just support it with Security Monkey?
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
Stay away from Lever. It's a slick web application along the lines of the fanciness of Asana's interface. What it isn't is a sane applicant tracking system. It doesn't reliably notify you when candidates apply. It supports virtually zero job board integrations. It very much wants you to adapt to it, with very little support for the other way around. The interface is over-complicated to the point of being unusable for…
How recently have you used Lever? The job board integrations got a lot better near the end of last year
Here is the job board integration from Lever [1], taken directly from my Lever account.
Here is the job board integration from JobScore [2][3][4], taken directly from my JobScore account. I wouldn't say that JobScore is necessarily all that great either, but it does certain basic things that Lever has punted on.
And yes, that's right. It took me 3 screenshots to fit all of the JobScore integrations in.
Granted, Lever does have a lot more sourcing firm integrations, but that isn't my use case and it doesn't provide value to me.
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/cf8njn0v0m0hm7e/Screenshot%202017-...
[2] https://www.dropbox.com/s/1ad31qzmj5gxnp1/Screenshot%202017-...
[3] https://www.dropbox.com/s/tfk6kx18666pqzv/Screenshot%202017-...
[4] https://www.dropbox.com/s/f429p5r8c2z4uui/Screenshot%202017-...
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Bebop, a company Google acquired last year for $380 Million > When Google decided to bring Diane Greene on full time to run Google Cloud, they had to purchase her company in order to facilitate that Well, that's an expensive hire.
I think it already paid off. She on-boarded Snap, Apple and Netflix Edit - I am impressed with Diane Greene. She donated all of her take from acquisition of her company - http://www.businessinsider.com/diane-green-donates-150m-to-c...
Maybe you meant Spotify?
Source: I worked with Snap when I was on the Google Cloud Platform team in 2012/2013.
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
I just don't get how this is considered "normal" - they create the ecosystem, let it thrive with the content users generate, and after some category/apps reach a certain interesting threshold, Google gathers all the data they have access to and use their massive distribution system to deploy their version built on the back of their userbase. I think it's dangerous, in all honesty. The same goes for Apple/Facebook/Ama…
Does this result in a better or worse user experience? Personally I don't care if a company built atop of Google fails. The only thing I care about is consumer welfare, and good quality products + lower prices.
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
> and will replace Android as soon as a viable alternative is presented One alternative that's been around for a while you might like if you want to continue using smart mobile devices is an operating system made by Apple (not Google), called iOS (used to be called iPhone OS but it can now be used on tablets too even some music players like iPods have it). Just throwing that out there, they have a lot of similar feat…
The OP seems concerned about privacy. Apple certainly has a lot of PR activity promoting privacy of their products. But at the same time it seems so many websites, apps, companies, ISPs, etc. are hoping to track their users much more than before. Perhaps even sell profiles on their users to advertisers or other tech companies. Apple also seems to be a fairly secretive company. Their products have historically felt mo…
>We don’t build a profile based on your email content or web browsing habits to sell to advertisers. We don’t “monetize” the information you store on your iPhone or in iCloud. And we don’t read your email or your messages to get information to market to you.
Re: Google launches Hire, a new service for helping businesses recruit
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you have the same complaint about, as another user mentioned, not being able to recover your data when you forget the password to an encrypted drive? This is a pretty disingenuous analogy. GP did not ask about recovering data from the device. GP asked about starting over from scratch. Most people do have the expectation that an old encrypted drive can be reformatted and repurposed without knowing the key.
True, but in this case, you're "encrypting" (or really, securing) your device, and not your data. (I realize this will be misunderstood because "encrypting your device" normally means encrypting the data on your device). The whole point of that is as an anti-theft measure (a stolen device [with a locked bootloader] cannot be factory reset without the original owner's permission). It would be kind of silly if you coul…
Presumably the permission should come _before_ the reset? After the reset, all the data is gone anyway, and asking the password at that point seems pointless since
> I
I read it as - "I did a completely normal thing like performing a factory reset of a consumer device (something that people have been doing for over a decade)"