Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And of course, with their own ARM processors they can further dumb down macOS and lock it down Anything to back this up? There was nothing preventing them from ‘locking down’ an intel based macOS, and I haven’t seen any evidence of a money grab with M1 based macOS either…
> There was nothing preventing them from ‘locking down’ an intel based macOS On Intel Macs, you can install Linux and Windows if you are unhappy with macOS. So they couldn't really lock it down. With their own custom ARM processors, they can prevent the installation of other OSes. Thus, like with iPhone or iPad, you will be stuck with the OS they provide. With the M1, so far you can only run other OSes on VM.
“I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft” (2004)
221–226 of 226 posts
Re: “I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft” (2004)
#222Earlier quoted context omitted.
IME device/os choice is usually more around IT security than weird cultish things. I.e. my current job, we only use iOS/mac because then IT only has to worry about keeping a fleet of iOS/macs patched and secured. Instead of Windows and a million different linux distros. I also personally think they picked osx because devs using windows probably won't care (since windows is already not great for dev), mac people are h…
windows is already not great for dev? I'll bite, what were you doing, ios apps? lol
Re: “I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft” (2004)
#223Earlier quoted context omitted.
To open unsigned software, right click, click Open, and click Open on the dialog that pops up. That’s for High Sierra and newer releases.
It's still annoying. Apple needs to realize, it's my machine, and I'll take whatever risks I want. Stop trying to police me as though I'm incompetent. I know full well at this point if some random executable is going to be sketchy and it's wholly on me if I run it. It's just a push to go to the app store, while convenient, it most certainly is not for developers who don't want to deal with their BS to maintain a pres…
Re: “I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft” (2004)
#224Earlier quoted context omitted.
> There was nothing preventing them from ‘locking down’ an intel based macOS On Intel Macs, you can install Linux and Windows if you are unhappy with macOS. So they couldn't really lock it down. With their own custom ARM processors, they can prevent the installation of other OSes. Thus, like with iPhone or iPad, you will be stuck with the OS they provide. With the M1, so far you can only run other OSes on VM.
Ok, but they’ve done the opposite- helping linux projects get linux on M1 macs..
Re: “I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft” (2004)
#225Earlier quoted context omitted.
And on the other hand 4GB or more of ram would require Vista 64bit, which today remains the most crash-prone and unstable leaky bucket of an operating system I’ve ever been subjected to, at least in the first year of release.
No it doesn't. Both Windows and Linux have PAE.
Re: “I would buy a Mac today if I was not working at Microsoft” (2004)
#226Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh god yes. There's nothing more embarrassing than being unable to exit fullscreen powerpoint because the touch bar just won't show the ESC option because you once changed a setting about the touchbar. ESC should never permanently disappear!
This is part of why I like the MacBook Air M1 computer so much. Great keyboard with an esc key.