What Startups Are Really Like
111–120 of 128 posts
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#112Earlier quoted context omitted.
I guess it depends on how you describe it, eh? "I own a software company" does sound like it'd be more successful than "I run an internet startup."
I say "I own a company", exactly because "I have an internet startup" seems like an eye-roller. I agree with the previous comment: the fact that we're out-of-the-ordinary in Chicago is one of the things I like best about Chicago.
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is the weirdest thing. You're explaining my own software to me. (The editor is the part of Viaweb I wrote.) I'd forgotten there was a head-tags variable. But thanks to you I've finally been able to get rid of the annoying Yahoo favicon. Incidentally, you don't have to override head-tags. You can just change the global value on the Variables page. Sorry about the usability issues. It was pretty good for 1997.
I love it that you and the many people you surround yourself with are brilliant web developers - and your site has a 90's almost craigslist asthetic. But like craigslist, it's a very ironic cool and minimalist design that I hope you don't change.
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will tell you one aspect where they're different: I can show a business partner some very evil and cut-throat side of me that I will do anything absolutely necessary to shield from my girlfriend.
Yeah, you're not married--you can't hide that stuff from a wife forever.
I suspect, however, that you refer to sucessful marriage, which could easily span several successful startups.
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#115Rather, it's that so much pretense has been acceptable for so long. If technology knowledge isn't necessary to make successful technology investments, why do the asset managers put up with the charade?
Is it all just an effect of VC rewards being too loosely coupled with results?
(#15 seems to me to follow as a matter of course, and is, arguably, the other side to the same coin)
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#116#14 strikes me as the most startling. It's not that I hadn't guessed VC cluelessness, despite never having talked to them myself. Rather, it's that so much pretense has been acceptable for so long. If technology knowledge isn't necessary to make successful technology investments, why do the asset managers put up with the charade? Is it all just an effect of VC rewards being too loosely coupled with results? (#15 seem…
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're not overanalyzing it - you're making generalizations about women that are naive and, in my view, offensive.
It seems to me that honest advice about what actually works in dating usually offends people. Go pick up virtually any book by and for pickup artists. (Or start with a website like http://www.seductiontuition.com/. ) You will find it full of incredibly crass generalizations about women that are guaranteed to offend. But it works! Pickup artists aren't worried about being politically correct, they are interested in ge…
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#118I sometimes wonder if the Valley culture doesn't socially construct some of the startup pathologies. For example, startups taking over your life: why does this happen? Is this because startups take over your life and nothing can be done about this? I am skeptical of this: I run a small business, the time demands are rather modest, and I live a life outside of work. I'm surely not uniquely in a position to do this. No…
Patrick, I definitely both respect and admire the business you built. You can also say I'm pro the 37 signals mantra. But I think your advice is specific to the model you've built and the output you are yielding. I don't remember the numbers but I think you are somewhere around 100k (or less) in yearly revenue? Startups, whether logical/warranted or not, seem to be aiming orders of magnitude more than this, yes?
This is equally true for what pg is saying, of course.
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love it that you and the many people you surround yourself with are brilliant web developers - and your site has a 90's almost craigslist asthetic. But like craigslist, it's a very ironic cool and minimalist design that I hope you don't change.
Actually the design of HN derives from the (old) design of del.icio.us/popular. So it's at least an early 2000s aesthetic.
Looking at it with firebug, the whole nav is one tall .gif and all the links are mapped via rectangular coordinates. The title for each essay is also a .gif, though they have alt description tags.
I know its your baby, but if you managed this with wordpress or another CMS, it would be really easy and you could be much more flexible to add new things. With wordpress, you could make a theme just like your current, but with CSS styled text links and you would just make static pages for all your new essays and whatnot. I could recreate your whole site in about an hour if you'd like.
Re: What Startups Are Really Like
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
I say "I own a company", exactly because "I have an internet startup" seems like an eye-roller. I agree with the previous comment: the fact that we're out-of-the-ordinary in Chicago is one of the things I like best about Chicago.
It's basic salesmanship. Phrase things in the way that sounds best (within the bounds of honesty of course). "I have an internet startup" sounds a lot like "I fell for a get rich quick scheme. Would you like to buy some vitamins?"