Live data from Hacker News

Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

youtube.com

41–50 of 58 posts

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#41
post #34

Title is a bit misleading this seams mainly like a form of shell, comparing it to Torvals linux kernel or unix seams wierd. As a shell however i feel it is a interesting change of perspective.

The shell is what you see, but there's a full OS underneath it, including a window manager and whatnot. You can reprogram any part of the OS dynamically from this shell, which is the main point Terry is trying to make - it's an OS aimed at hackers who he thinks should have 100% control over the system down to the hardware - and he has a novel way of enabling that to happen with an interpreter and JIT compiler for his…

That "novel" idea was common in Xerox PARC machines.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#42
post #41
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The shell is what you see, but there's a full OS underneath it, including a window manager and whatnot. You can reprogram any part of the OS dynamically from this shell, which is the main point Terry is trying to make - it's an OS aimed at hackers who he thinks should have 100% control over the system down to the hardware - and he has a novel way of enabling that to happen with an interpreter and JIT compiler for his…

That "novel" idea was common in Xerox PARC machines.

I didn't claim the idea was novel, only that Davis's implementation is novel. The idea of a single address space operating system which can be modified while it's running is older than unix.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#43
post #36
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why did you leave out the parts that are inconvenient to the narrative you're making up? "Europe should be blue" - is that racist? I guess the technical achievement means nothing. Where is your certificate of political correctness? Why is it socially acceptable to bully like this?

it isn't inconvenient to the narrative, though it might not be immediately obvious https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_blood calling out racism isn't bullying and it's incoherent to label it as such, davis has a long history of racist ranting much more offensive than labeling africa black. he's mentally ill and it's sad but it's not to be overlooked

No, "calling someone out" for being mentally ill is bullying. Even if that illness takes the form of racist rants.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd say we've pretty much gone full circle. Suffocating levels of political correctness alongside a self-obsessed victim culture have made a lot of people sympathetic to the trope of the outrageous, out of touch savant.

I admit it's hard to balance the approaches behind "He's just a troubled person," "He's a raving nut," "He's a raving nut, but so what?" and so on.

> I admit it's hard to balance the approaches behind "He's just a troubled person," "He's a raving nut," "He's a raving nut, but so what?" and so on.

Do you mean Davis or Torvalds?

Frankly, I'd avoid both of them.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#46
post #35
post #33

There is one point in this demonstration where it looks like TempleOS is monitoring the registers in "real-time". It looked like in one column he had the names of the registers and in the other column the memory addresses stored in them, updating on the screen as he worked. Is this what I was seeing or am I mistaken? The OS also seems to track what each CPU is doing in the scrolling banners; and there was a brief vie…

The values displayed are retrieved each time the window is redrawn, which might be each time he moves the cursor or at a set frame-rate. It obviously doesn't detect changes in memory then print those changes on screen immediately.

Log file instead of screen.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#47
post #27
post #24

Most of us will never use TempleOS, few will appreciate the skill shown here and fewer will understand Davis' religious goals. But you could also look at TempleOS as a research prototype, roughly the kind of thing which once might have been produced at Xerox PARC, and see that TempleOS implements some startlingly interesting ideas. For example, in this demo, the way that graphics are treated inline with source text a…

comparing this to IPython Notebook is a big stretch and an insult to MATLAB and IPython notebook. There's no way this would have ever come out of PARC, you're exaggerating Davis's work. Also, it's impossible to "look past the religious stuff" - it's part of, all of TempleOS. To me this is just a crazy guy who's been tinkering with 80s technology while the rest of the world has moved on. I feel bad for him , but I jus…

If you don't mind my engaging you:

What 'insult' (imho insult is in the mind of the beholder, but that's for another day)? Do you see the religious stuff, in being un-overlookable, also as some kind of insult? But more important to me is your critique of his experiment; do you really feel "bad for him" for exploring ideas of his own labor? C'mon, isn't that what a hacker is? Surely it matters more to be true to your self than to align with the world's reputations. Thank you for your time.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/gods-lonely-programmer https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8658283

The random number generator as God concept has been stuck in my head since I first read that Vice article. In games, both tabletop and computer games, the RNG plays the role of God (a mysterious power that can bring good or bad fortune and even life or death). It's interesting how that idea plays out in a schizophrenic mind.

Heh, i keep seeing roguelike players go "bless RNGsius" or similar when they get a particularly potent item.

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#49
post #13

This is a feature I'd actually really like to have in an actual terminal. The ability to display graphics would be useful for many things.

If Linux is booted with vesafb enabled, many programs can draw graphics without using X.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_framebuffer

Re: Why Davis' TempleOS is better than Torvald's Linux

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I admit it's hard to balance the approaches behind "He's just a troubled person," "He's a raving nut," "He's a raving nut, but so what?" and so on.

> I admit it's hard to balance the approaches behind "He's just a troubled person," "He's a raving nut," "He's a raving nut, but so what?" and so on. Do you mean Davis or Torvalds? Frankly, I'd avoid both of them.

Or Theo DeRaat
Post reply on HN