For Sale: 29,656.51306529 Bitcoins

There is an eventual fixed supply of coins (21 million), with currently ~13 million in circulation (http://blockexplorer.com/q/totalbc). Given that the 13 million isn't increasing at any meaningful rate as it relates to the money supply, we can almost consider the supply fixed (at least on any short term perspective).

With this fixed supply, if more people become interested in using bitcoin as a unit of exchange and buy it in order to use it, then they will increase the demand and thus the price. If they used it to transfer money back home (i.e. remittances), and their family their exited the position back into cash, then the demand would be neutral. In reality, their is some cost of carry where by holding it for a period, you still increase the demand.

That would an explanation for the price were it governed by an actual underlying value.

In reality, the price is mainly governed by speculators hoping that it will be used by people as a unit of exchange eventually and thus the speculators are buying and holding coins.

The process here was that government announced forfeiture action, people were given a chance to claim a property interest and fight the forfeiture, and no one chose to do so.

Ulbricht was clearly aware of it, and did assert a claim to other property that was the subject of the same forfeiture action. The seizure was a default judgement because there was no property owner to contest the forfeiture.

What additional process is due, and to whom is it due?

This is exactly what I meant by "you'll fool yourself into believing things that aren't true." You cannot reason about the price of bitcoin in terms of fundamentals. Not right now; not when the price is a function of a few hundred people (some of whom are maliciously manipulating the market).

I've been closely watching how the price of bitcoin reacts to announcements since mid last year. The price goes up? People come up with a reason that makes sense. The price goes down? People come up with a reason. The price has gone down; you've come up with a reason, and lo, it seems to make sense. Except none of these reasonings make any sense whatsoever because the market isn't logical. It doesn't pay any attention to your theories, or mine, or anyone else's. The price inexorably follows from the actions of fewer than a couple hundred people, almost all of whom are trying to prey off each other. That's the game. Buy to raise the price; sell after others follow your lead.

You can craft a theory that makes sense for any possible upswing or downswing. But what fools we were to think our theories mattered back in November, when the price was almost entirely due to Mt. Gox's market manipulation!

My opinion in this matter has been forged by the heavy hammer of experience. Don't make my mistake; don't delude yourself by having the hubris to think you alone can reason your way around an irrational gambler's market. Here's how it will go. You'll make some money, and you'll feel smart and elated. Then you'll risk a little bit too much on your "insight" and watch as it crumbles beneath your feet and you lose some money. But not too much; you're smart, after all. But then you'll hear stories of others who have fared Bette than you, and you'll start to get a bit jealous. It's just a matter of experience, you'll tell yourself. I'll do better now that I know not to do that again. So you'll try a new, more insightful theory. A theory based on sound fundamentals. And then you'll make a bunch of money, and you'll think you've got it all figured out. So you'll wager even more on your theory (which, somehow, everyone else has seemingly overlooked, but Nevermind that, our theory is based on logic so it must be correct!) and then when the market's irrationality catches up to your reality, you'll lose big.

Greed does indeed drive the market. And greed doesn't play by fair or logical rules.

You can't have a trial with only one party.

The owner of the bitcoins had an opportunity to contest the forfeiture, and didn't step forward to do that. Given the value of the bitcoins and the public nature of the seizure and forfeiture actions, its hardly likely that that was due to lack of effective notice, or it not being worth expending effort to protect the assets.