Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, the goal of these security products is to defend against the government, not a random guy. In that context, it's extremely important that their server undergo the same level of cryptanalysis.
We already know the system is hopelessly vulnerable to server side MITM attacks, it makes no effort to defend against that attack model. It's mentioned in the comments that they might do manual key verification in the future, but that doesn't happen now. Compromise is silent.
$200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
71–80 of 176 posts
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#72Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#73So yeah guys, Pavel Durov saw your comments regarding security of Telegram messenger. Go for it.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#74Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
It actually makes things worse really "no hackers can break this!" sounds good on paper, but it could just mean your adversary has more to gain by the system not being publicly broken.
I don't see how it makes things worse. Surely it shows more if you gave hackers a big incentive to crack your encryption and they still didn't, compared to them not cracking it when there was no incentive. It is evidence that the reason they did not crack it was the difficulty of the problem, not just indifference.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, the goal of these security products is to defend against the government, not a random guy. In that context, it's extremely important that their server undergo the same level of cryptanalysis.
We already know the system is hopelessly vulnerable to server side MITM attacks, it makes no effort to defend against that attack model. It's mentioned in the comments that they might do manual key verification in the future, but that doesn't happen now. Compromise is silent.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm afraid breaking into Telegram's central server (by the way, there is no such thing) will hardly enable you to decipher end-to-end encrypted secret chats. But certainly worth trying anyway.
It will allow you to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack on all encrypted traffic though, which would certainly be enough to read messages in plaintext.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#78Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#79This is such a sham. Here, I'll offer $2000 to break my plaintext crypto. Every morning, in the shower, I'll say a secret word. Email me the secret word and I'll send you $2000 in BTC.
I'll take my $2k now.