Most of the concerns people had were Telegram's servers acting maliciously or being coerced into acting maliciously, which is obviously not covered by this contest or the protocol they have designed. It's a bit disingenuous that Telegram is broken but not in a way that this bounty could pay for.
$200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
31–40 of 176 posts
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#32Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
what do you think the definition of "$200,000 in bitcoins" is?
I think it means its 200k in "bitcoin" thats near impossible to cash out at such volumes. So I think this is a PR stunt and nothing more. Rolling your own encryption has always been proven to be the worst idea.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#34Cryptography Snake Oil Warning Sign #9: Cracking contests. https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-9902.html (1999)
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#35Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#36Cryptography Snake Oil Warning Sign #9: Cracking contests. https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-9902.html (1999)
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#37. IN/OUT
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#38Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
It actually makes things worse really "no hackers can break this!" sounds good on paper, but it could just mean your adversary has more to gain by the system not being publicly broken.
I don't see how it makes things worse. Surely it shows more if you gave hackers a big incentive to crack your encryption and they still didn't, compared to them not cracking it when there was no incentive. It is evidence that the reason they did not crack it was the difficulty of the problem, not just indifference.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
what do you think the definition of "$200,000 in bitcoins" is?
I think it means its 200k in "bitcoin" thats near impossible to cash out at such volumes. So I think this is a PR stunt and nothing more. Rolling your own encryption has always been proven to be the worst idea.