This is such a sham. Here, I'll offer $2000 to break my plaintext crypto. Every morning, in the shower, I'll say a secret word. Email me the secret word and I'll send you $2000 in BTC.
$200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
51–60 of 176 posts
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#52how you are then going to make a money ?
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, it's probably against the rules of the competition and will get you arrested if you try. But I think if someone does break into their central server and wins the competition that way, they should still be paid out.
No, the goal of these security products is to defend against the government, not a random guy. In that context, it's extremely important that their server undergo the same level of cryptanalysis.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#54To make this a slightly fair challenge, we should at least be allowed to get the clear text of our choice also encrypted with the same key.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#55> 100% FREE & NO ADS: Telegram is free and will always be free. We do not plan to sell ads or introduce subscription fees. how you are then going to make a money ?
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Expanded here: https://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-9812.html#contests
This contest isn't a great example of the kind of contests he is talking about. 1) They are giving you the source code, protocol, and a tcpdump of all traffic between the chatters. You can even send messages via the protocol to one of the participants. Its not just here is some encrypted data, decrypt it. 2) They are offering a significant amount of money.
2) there are no arbitrary definition of what winning means
The definition of winning in this contest creates a large class of potential vulnerabilities that would be paid $0.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately, this doesn't mean that it's secure. If someone breaks it, it means it's broken, but if nobody breaks it, it doesn't mean someone else can't break it (or hasn't already).
Agreed, but the tone of the previous discussion was definitely more along the lines of "This could never work, you guys don't know what you're doing." If it proves resilient over 2.5 months of highly motivated attacks (motivated by both the money / "I-Told-You-So" factor), I think that's a fairly strong statement in their favor.
Re: $200,000 to the first person to break Telegram
#58Most of the concerns people had were Telegram's servers acting maliciously or being coerced into acting maliciously, which is obviously not covered by this contest or the protocol they have designed. It's a bit disingenuous that Telegram is broken but not in a way that this bounty could pay for.
Yeah, it's probably against the rules of the competition and will get you arrested if you try. But I think if someone does break into their central server and wins the competition that way, they should still be paid out.