Live data from Hacker News

The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

rollingstone.com

201–210 of 211 posts

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#201
post #169

Cruelty is, of course, despicable and should be stopped. The vast majority of growers are decent and moral. It's easy for activists to find and focus on bad apples and make it seem like all meat suppliers are criminal monsters. This is simply not true. This would be like meat eating activists finding bad actors in the farming industry to then acuse the entirety of that industry with criminal behaviour. Ridiculous. As…

> The vast majority of growers are decent and moral. Really? I think a lot of these decent/moral farmers are getting replaced by huge corporations that are only interested in profit. >Drop two people on an island. Sigh This point is taking it to an extreme. Yes, I'm a veggie/vegan becz of the environment I'm in. Put people on an island and most likely everyone will turn into a raving beast (aka Lord of the Flies). >T…

It's hypothetical. Don't over-think it.

Still, both people would be handicapped in different respects. How many vegans can climb trees and identify the various edible species of plant life on an island. I'll tell you one thing, the idea of having to live off plants in the wild scares me. Unless you happen to come upon something like an apple, orange, fig or other recognizable tree you are screwed. The guy in the Survivorman show makes it look easy, but he has an army of consultants preparing him before each trip. That's how he knows that a specific grass is edible and that the root of a given plant is good food. Without that most city dwellers would not know what to do with most vegetation on an island. You could easily kill yourself if you eat the wrong plant.

In that sense meat is easy. So long as the animal doesn't kill you first and you clean and cook it you are generally pretty safe.

An omnivore can eat anything, ants, grubs, bugs of all kinds, worms, snakes, lizards, crabs, rabbits, rats, etc. You just have to be smart enough to make a trap and a fire. Find a reasonably flat rock, heat it up and use it to cook. I think most people who have watched a little television can figure out how to do that, particularly when coupled with the intense need to survive. Making fire isn't easy. I've done it. I failed miserably a bunch of times before I got it. My hands were shredded, but I did it. If you are not injured and persevere it isn't impossible. It can be painfully hard, but not impossible.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#202

Its hard for me to seriously consider changing my opinion from an article that shows its biases so clearly. You show me the worst case scenario, but what is the average case? Also, what are the alternatives to these techniques? If you don't like cattle prodding, what do you suggest instead? Not eating meat or drinking milk is not going to be an acceptable answer. Edit: Not going to be acceptable as an alternative to…

I believe cultured beef is the answer.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#203
post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>>Argumentum ad... I've been reading your posts and I can't help but notice that you sound like someone who just started taking 'Philosophy 101: Introduction to Logic' in college.

Ad hominem. :)

Ad rock

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#204
post #199
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There seems to be quite a number of people who embrace the reasoning that it's more ethical to eat animals if one kills them themselves. (I'm not sure if I'm not reading this into what you're writing, if this is not your position I apologise, but anyway this is for the purpose of discussing said position in general.) I disagree with this in general. The act of feeding oneself is necessary for survival, whereas killin…

For buddhists, not killing is mostly axiomatic, based on the Five Precepts. The mental gymnastics that guy was undertaking trying to reconcile that axiom with other dogma that would otherwise allow killing was quite impressive. That's the problem with axioms.

How? I don't see that in what he says (I see other problems which I mentioned previously). It's not "do not kill under any kind of circumstance, willingly or not, consciously or not". There's a lot of nuance behind the simple, short Buddhist precept "I will refrain (or abstain) from killing". Precepts are shortly formulated to help you keep in mind a huge deal of theory and, more importantly, practice behind them. And they are explicitly not abstract axioms to be dogmatically held without any kind of practical context of reality.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#205
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nature is not morally right. In fact, nature is amoral. Pointing to nature and saying "nature does it so it's ok" is a bit like pointing at a landslide and saying "nature does it so it's ok to build my house like this". It's meaningless. Unlike most animals (as far as we know) we are in the unique position of being moral creatures. We created this morality idea, which was not present in nature before us. Killing any…

But it's not, meat is so essential to human diets that unlike all other non-meat eating animals, we evolved away the mechanisms for surviving on plant only diets (or at least the kinds of plants a human would be expected to find in their local environment - shipping scientifically engineered and manufactured yeast paste halfway around the planet is kind of cheating ). Reducing the arguments to "because we don't stric…

Is meat that essential to human diets when millions upon millions of non-meat eaters have successfully lived without consuming meat?

You simply can't say that meat is "so essential" because it clearly isn't, any more.

I eat meat for no other reason than pleasure, convenience and laziness but I, and most probably everyone else on the planet, could easily sustain a healthy, long life not eating meat.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#206
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shame on you for trying to distort the precepts of Buddha. Stop embarrassing yourself!

But he's not distorting, what he said is actually very much in line with at least Theravada Buddhist view on morality. Here, I've posted this[0] a few hours ago because of this discussion and a comment I made above. Straight from the horse's mouth, approximately. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6884572

Theravada isn't what Buddha taught. It's an 'innovation' of what Buddha taught. It's a different school of thought and has a different monastic code.

Why don't you read a real book instead of learning from YouTube celebrities? Learn the truth.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#207
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Flag a view you disagree with? How original and insightful. Well researched long form journalism is something HN discussion desperately needs more of. Whatever your opinion on eating animals is, where our food comes from is a discussion that needs to be had. We need less of Stallman and Bitcoin.

It's not the article I object to, it's the vegans crawling out of the woodwork throwing heresay, poorly researched studies, outright lies and moral browbeating around that I find endlessly tiresome.

Then engage.

This is an issue that people feel strongly about, in both directions. Both sides make all kinds of strange claims sometimes but there is good stuff there too.

I think the widely varying level of argument shows that this is an infant discussion that needs to mature. It is only going to do that if we keep talking about it.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#208
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But he's not distorting, what he said is actually very much in line with at least Theravada Buddhist view on morality. Here, I've posted this[0] a few hours ago because of this discussion and a comment I made above. Straight from the horse's mouth, approximately. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6884572

Theravada isn't what Buddha taught. It's an 'innovation' of what Buddha taught. It's a different school of thought and has a different monastic code. Why don't you read a real book instead of learning from YouTube celebrities? Learn the truth.

Why thank you, how very Buddhist of you. :)

EDIT: ... to assume so much.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#209
post #205
post #159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But it's not, meat is so essential to human diets that unlike all other non-meat eating animals, we evolved away the mechanisms for surviving on plant only diets (or at least the kinds of plants a human would be expected to find in their local environment - shipping scientifically engineered and manufactured yeast paste halfway around the planet is kind of cheating ). Reducing the arguments to "because we don't stric…

Is meat that essential to human diets when millions upon millions of non-meat eaters have successfully lived without consuming meat? You simply can't say that meat is "so essential" because it clearly isn't, any more. I eat meat for no other reason than pleasure, convenience and laziness but I, and most probably everyone else on the planet, could easily sustain a healthy, long life not eating meat.

Yes. There are specific nutrients that humans can't synthesize and have absolutely zero plant sources. The obvious one is animal protein, which is structured and metabolized differently than plant protein. But more specifically:

- Vitamin B12, you don't need a lot of it (a few grams of meat per week provides more than 100% of the dietary sources), but every single study of populations of Vegans shows that the majority of them are deficient and have Hyperhomocysteinemia as a result. Hyperhomocysteinemia is only ever seen in four populations, the extreme elderly (due to age related nutrition absorption and metabolic issues), third world countries with chronic poverty, extreme alcoholics and vegans. You can get by for a very long time as B12 deficient, but it will catch up to you and the result isn't particularly pleasant. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6883090 some more I've compiled on this

- DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid), an Omega-3, pretty much available only from animal sources (and a very small algae source which is often used as a supplement precursor) has been shown important to normal cognitive functioning. Every study I'm aware of has shown that vegans are deficient in DHA (even though it can be synthesized from ALA which is the kind of Omega-3 found in flax seeds and chia etc. it's preferentially synthesized to EPA another Omega-3 which also has plant sources). Omega-3 is essential and not all O3FAs are equal. Despite being able to find DHA in algae in sea vegetables, most vegans simply don't eat enough of it.

- Vitamin A - readily discussed in Vegan sources as "available in plants, but hard to get sufficient quantities of a complete source". Vitamin A is a group of compounds, not just one, and plant sources don't offer a complete source. It's readily available in animal sources, especially liver. Vegans are typically deficient in retinol which is used in the development of epithelial cells an essential and basic component of animal tissue.

Non-essential, but had to very hard to impossible to get in plant form in sufficient quantities (i.e. studies of vegan populations show shortfalls in the majority of the studied population):

- Arginine (partially synthesized by humans, but needs to be supplemented by food sources. Animal sources are much better sources than plans. But if you eat sufficient plant sources, which majority populations of vegans have been shown not to do, you can get by.

- Creatine, synthesized by Arginine, along with Methionine (which is better sourced from eggs then plants as well) and glycine (which is readily synthesized by humans), has been shown to be majority population deficient in every study of vegans I'm aware of. Creatine is important for muscle development and maintenance. You'll find that vegan athletes are aware of this dietary shortfall and supplement.

- Carnosine, only available in animal sources. Carnosine has been shown to be an important dipeptide and important in normal muscle function (where it can be used to significantly boost performance with sources of beta-Alanine). It also has been shown to be a major preventative factor in Alzheimers, Diabetes proper skin function and various age related illnesses suggesting long term consumption is important for healthy long-term living.

- Vitamin-D - especially in northern latitudes or people who don't get enough sun exposure. The primary dietary sources are all animal sources (beef liver, eggs, cheese, fish, etc.). Vegans have shown to have higher rates of vitamin D deficiency than other populations.

and it goes on and on and on.

Vegan diets also make adequate nutrition decisions and monitoring more complicated. For example, complete Zinc intake should be at around 15mg per day, but diets high in phytates require more as phytates disrupt zinc absorption. Similarly iron intake has to be measured at higher doses as what humans actually need is Heme, which is synthesized from Iron. Heme only has animal sources, which is generally used to explain anemia that's common vegan populations.

In addition, animal sources are simply required for normal child development even if adults can get by for longer periods without some of the above. Studies of children raised on vegan diets show significant health and cognitive deficits as animal sources are either the only or the best sources of critical bone, blood, muscle and brain development.

Long term studies of vegans have shown that over 90% of vegans are deficient in one or more of the above, despite supplements being a traditional part of the vegan diet. Most vegans do not stay vegans for more than a few years as the health and nutrition deficits build up, they'll wax on and off the diet -- this provides essential B12 at interval, and since B12 doesn't require constant intake, is usually enough to keep off the worst effects of B12 deficiency. Carnosine however has been shown to be a significant problem in long-term vegan (and vegetarian) diets and is generally attributed to the reason why vegans, despite being healthier in several categories, die at ages and rates similar to omnivores.

Every single one of these deficiencies and health issues are solved on normal omnivorous diets.

Re: The Price We Pay for Cheap Meat

#210
post #207
post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not the article I object to, it's the vegans crawling out of the woodwork throwing heresay, poorly researched studies, outright lies and moral browbeating around that I find endlessly tiresome.

Then engage . This is an issue that people feel strongly about, in both directions. Both sides make all kinds of strange claims sometimes but there is good stuff there too. I think the widely varying level of argument shows that this is an infant discussion that needs to mature. It is only going to do that if we keep talking about it.

You'll see that I have here. While doing so I came across some new bizarre claims by vegan publications I hadn't seen before like "omnivores are also b12 deficient!" and other absolutely unbelievable garbage. It's amazing to me that anybody who claims to be a thinking animal can fall for what are essentially outright lies needed to justify an extreme life-style.
Post reply on HN