Earlier quoted context omitted.
$1000! Crazy laowai. As a data point, my current F visa is 2 years, multi-entry, 90 days and cost the nominal fee plus about $100 for the visa company to drop it off at the consulate. Apparently, the F visa has been re-purposed and there is a new M business visa. Any practical experience with that? [of course, China habitually hassles journalists (Bloomberg) over visas]
I assume China is impossible for someone with a bad peanut allergy? (Gets sick just with a bowl of peanuts in the same room.)
Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
71–80 of 216 posts
Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, the problem is that there's a bit of a cultural difference between Americans circa-Industrial Revolution, and the Chinese now. So saying that the Chinese will stand up and protest isn't necessarily true. I don't want to speak for all Chinese, but from what I've read -- please correct me if I'm wrong -- is that there is more of a culture of deference to authority in China. Compare this to Americans, who have a…
There are astonishing numbers of protests in China every year.[1][2] I also think the culture for factory workers during the industrial revolution was one of deference to authority, and that it took extreme conditions to spur them to protest their conditions. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protest_and_dissent_in_the_Peop... [2] http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/02/rising-protests-i...
Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
The air pollution levels are similar to living an airport smoking lounge. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-30/beijing-air-akin-to...
EDIT: apparently my post below was predicated on a false assumption, please disregard. That's Beijing, not Shanghai, and I think we can assume that Beijing is at least slightly cleaner than Shanghai, if not by much. According this article[0], Shanghai's level reached 602.5, which, when compared to the data on the graph you linked, is about 75 points higher than Beijing. [0]: http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireSt…
re: "crazy bad" being tweeted by the US Embassy in Beijing -- a cautionary tale on string sanitization. "The "crazy bad" terminology – which was at odds with the normally sober and scientific language of the Twitter account – appeared to have been a joke embedded in the embassy's monitoring program and triggered by a reading that was off the normal scale."
[0] http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/nov/19/craz...
Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#74So why do people use those flimsy face masks instead of proper gas masks / carbon filters?
Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#75Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#76Is there a level of public outcry regarding the pollution? I realize that criticism may be somewhat muted given the nature of the PRC government, but I can't imagine a city as large and cosmopolitan as Shanghai merely accepting this level of environmental mismanagement. Unfortunately, articles regarding Beijing/Shanghai pollution usually fail to mention public sentiment above the level of brief individual anecdote ("…
Fair question. My impression here in Beijing is that people are highly dissatisfied with the pollution situation. They don't want lung cancer and they don't want their kids breathing this crap. That being said, the government is taking steps to address the issue. Specifically, due to an outcry on Weibo last year about having to get PM2.5 numbers from the US embassy's twitter feed and iPhone app (twitter is blocked, b…
Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#77Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#78I wonder how this compares to the worst smogs experienced in London and elsewhere before the West got its act together with regard to particulate pollution. Apparently the Great Smog of 1952 killed on the order of 10000 people in just a few days. I'm not sure many young people nowadays realize how horrible the situation was just half a century ago. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Smog_of_1952
This is a great point. We've made so much progress in this area that "pollution" can seem like an abstraction. This is something we should be impressing upon our children, in a more serious way than stories about walking to school uphill in the snow both ways, etc.
I was two years old when this picture was taken in my home-town. I remember summer days in the following years that looked like this, with the brown air leaching colors from the sunlight itself.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/documerica111611/s...
From here:
http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2011/11/documerica-images...
It didn't compare to the Great Smog, of course, but for Americans, it's closer to home and of course also closer to the present.
Re: Schoolchildren ordered indoors as air pollution cloaks Shanghai
#79For historical reference, here are some breathtaking photos of mid-century Pittsburgh: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2155742/Hell-lid-tak... I wonder if anyone can cite a source for one of the claims made in the article: "Also lots of people thought that high smoke output was a sign of high productivity and that coal smoke was good for the lungs and helped crops grow."