Earlier quoted context omitted.
why should your readers accept your unsubstantiated hypothesis The typical line of thinking with conspiracy theories seems to be the less substantiated the theory, the more credence it should be lent, under the logic that the government is suppressing evidence. So basically the less evidence, the more believable. Beautiful, isn't it?
Except for the fact that there are more false statements than true ones...
Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
171–180 of 201 posts
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#172Earlier quoted context omitted.
I always liked the idea of making income tax filings public. Seems like it would make catching people who are dodging tax and the relevant discussions around it a lot easier.
also, makes it easier to figure out who to kidnap and also who to blackmail.
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#173Any good overviews of this leak yet?
The portions on 'genetic resources' were most interesting I thought, only because everything was so vaguely defined that I worried how countries would interpret it.
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would Congress pass legislation saying that it's not allowed to amend trade agreements? Why don't they just not amend trade agreements?
Congress now != congress in 2 years, remember.
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even better, what if the government was closing in a child pornographer with chemical weapons and a nuke, and the leak allowed him to rape more children while nuking a nunnery and poisoning an orphanage?
> Child pornographer with chemical weapons and a nuke Do even approximations to such boogieman figures even exist?
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
You forgot ...thus lowering house prices in a wide area . Now the electorate are on your side!
Wouldn't that only make the buyers happy, and the sellers upset? ;)
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kind sir, we appear to have run out of Nazi extermination camps. However, I invite you to book a one-way trip to North Korea. I hear their concentration camps are wonderful this time of the year.
And how did NK end up being that crazy? USA. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War#Bombing_North_Korea "As a result, almost every substantial building in North Korea was destroyed."
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would it violate any rights to privacy? What rights are you talking about, anyway? The only thing we don't share openly in this manner is personal health problems.
To clarify: It's my right, if I so choose, to keep my salary and any other personal financial information private from the rest of the world (minus of course, my employer and the IRS). So your releasing that information is a violation of my privacy.
Re: Secret Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really . . . hope . . . that governments will become incapable of keeping anything a secret. Does that include personal information about you, for example your personal medical information that is part of the treatment records of a government-administered medical insurance plan? Some countries (not many) make personal income tax filings public information. Do you live in such a country?
I always liked the idea of making income tax filings public. Seems like it would make catching people who are dodging tax and the relevant discussions around it a lot easier.